Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added definition for cyclic' to AbGroups/Cyclic.v #2050
Added definition for cyclic' to AbGroups/Cyclic.v #2050
Changes from 1 commit
55adc5b
5d59e74
a6c4ec7
db5f035
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why was this changed? It gets rid of one universe variable, but we don't generally try to avoid wild category notation just for that. (Moreover, I think with the next release of Coq those stray universe variables might go away.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was my suggestion from earlier, and yes, this will go away when Coq gets algebraic universes. I don't know if it will be the next release of Coq however. It still seems unfinished.
FTR @ndcroos the issue here is that the wildcat of groups should land in the unvierse
Set+1
however Coq doesn't let you write that for the moment, meaning we have to introduce a new universe variable strictly larger.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I missed that comment. But it seems weird to optimize that one result in Image.v to save a universe variable, but not the other results. And it's really orthogonal to this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One difference here is that we are expecting no universe variables, whereas in other places it is one extra. Anyway, we can cleanup other universe issues some other time.