-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(consensus): Assert that consensus ended in a valid state after processing a new block #1176
Open
msbrogli
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
feat/block-consensus-assert
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -47,6 +47,19 @@ def log(cls) -> Any: | |
|
||
def update_consensus(self, block: Block) -> None: | ||
self.update_voided_info(block) | ||
self.assert_valid_consensus(block) | ||
|
||
def assert_valid_consensus(self, block: Block) -> None: | ||
"""Assert that all transactions confirmed by the block are valid. | ||
|
||
This assertion might be slow because it runs in O(n) where n is number of transactions confirmed | ||
by the block.""" | ||
for tx in block.iter_transactions_in_this_block(): | ||
# Since this is the last step in the consensus, the conflict resolution has already been resolved. | ||
# Hence, at this point, all transactins confirmed by a block must be non-voided. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Typo: |
||
if tx_meta.voided_by and bool(self.context.consensus.soft_voided_tx_ids & tx_meta.voided_by): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What if there are other IDs in |
||
continue | ||
assert tx_meta.voided_by is None | ||
|
||
def update_voided_info(self, block: Block) -> None: | ||
""" This method is called only once when a new block arrives. | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should start running some nodes with
-O
. It removesassert
statements, so we could have more liberty in adding costly assertions. We should keep some nodes without-O
so we do catch bugs when those asserts are reached, but some other nodes could run without them so they don't have a performance penalty.*The loop, or the whole function, would have to be moved to
if __debug__
.