-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reviewing CWV report V2 #38
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Files not reviewed (1)
- definitions/output/reports/cwv_tech_categories.js: Evaluated as low risk
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
definitions/output/reports/cwv_tech_technologies.js:13
- Inconsistent naming of 'technology'. It should be consistently referred to as either 'tech.technology' or 'technology' throughout the file.
tech.technology
USING (category) | ||
GROUP BY | ||
category, | ||
categories.origins | ||
ORDER BY categories.origins DESC | ||
description, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sarahfossheim FYI v1/categories
will get this additional field in January.
added category descriptions, using changes from Category descriptions wappalyzer#89
major numeric versions of technologies + "ALL" (no API)
lighthouse audit pass rates (no API)
performance opportunities (no API)
Aligning technology origins and adoption metric between the crux and the crawl data (category origins are using only crawl)
As discussed on the monthly call