Correct component name for Pie Slice example#629
Merged
zibs merged 2 commits intoFormidableLabs:mainfrom Nov 5, 2025
Merged
Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
@zibs is attempting to deploy a commit to the formidable-labs Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
zibs
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR fixes a small documentation error in the
Pie.Sliceexample.In
website/docs/polar/pie/pie-slice.md, the description previously referred toPie.SliceAngularInsetin an example that actually demonstratesPie.Slice. This change corrects the reference so the docs accurately match the code snippet.Motivation was that I was using victory native xl for the first time, so reading the docs to understand how to use the Pie.Slice component. This mistake confused me for a second, so don't want other beginners to get lost on this.
Fixes # (no issue filed, just a doc correction I noticed while using the library)
Type of Change
How Has This Been Tested?
I ran the docs locally to verify that the updated text renders correctly. The example code snippet remains unchanged and works as before. As well as
yarn check:codeandyarn testas stated in the contributing guide.