Skip to content

fix: EMQX broker affinity and tolerations indentation #775

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
hardillb merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2025
Merged

fix: EMQX broker affinity and tolerations indentation #775

hardillb merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2025

Conversation

@ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor

@ppawlowski ppawlowski commented Dec 30, 2025

Description

This pull request fixes the indentation for spec.coreTemplate.spec.affinity and spec.coreTemplate.spec.tolerations values in the EMQX manifest template.

Related Issue(s)

https://github.com/FlowFuse/CloudProject/issues/993

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
  • Documentation has been updated
    • Upgrade instructions
    • Configuration details
    • Concepts
  • Changes flowforge.yml?
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/helm to update ConfigMap Template
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/CloudProject to update values for Staging/Production
  • Link to Changelog Entry PR, or note why one is not needed.

Labels

  • Includes a DB migration? -> add the area:migration label

@ppawlowski ppawlowski requested a review from hardillb December 30, 2025 15:26
@hardillb hardillb merged commit c92e01a into main Dec 30, 2025
8 checks passed
@hardillb hardillb deleted the fix-emqx-affinity-and-tolerations branch December 30, 2025 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@hardillb hardillb hardillb approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ppawlowski @hardillb