Skip to content

fix: binary content appears in composer when pasting image #60501

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit9625 rohit9625 commented Apr 18, 2025

Explanation of Change

In the previous patch where onPaste functionality was added, inside the override of onTextContextMenuItem(int id) we are calling the default super.onTextContextMenuItem(id) even when the clipboard contains binary content of the image.

I added the code to return true from the onTextContextMenuItem(int id) when pasting files because returning true indicates that the paste functionality is handled by our code.

Fixed Issues

$ #55304
PROPOSAL: #55304 (comment)

Tests

Prerequisites: You must have a Samsung Device to repro this issue

  1. Open the Expensify app
  2. Open any chat
  3. Open a photo in Android gallery
  4. Tap on "..." - "Copy to clipboard"
  5. Switch back to the Expensify app
  6. Long tap the composer and tap on "Paste" from the context menu
  7. Tap on "Send" after the image appeared and wait until you redirected to the chat
  8. Make sure that the composer doesn't contain any binary text
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as normal Tests steps

QA Steps

Prerequisites: You must have a Samsung Device to repro this issue
Perform the same steps for Standard App as the issue is reproducible on Android only.

  1. Open the Expensify app
  2. Open any chat
  3. Open a photo in Android gallery
  4. Tap on "..." - "Copy to clipboard"
  5. Switch back to the Expensify app
  6. Long tap the composer and tap on "Paste" from the context menu
  7. Tap on "Send" after the image appeared and wait until you redirected to the chat
  8. Make sure that the composer doesn't contain any binary text

Note: For other targets, just try copy pasting images/files in the composer.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
After_React_Native_Patch.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android_Chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
iOS_Native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS_Safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Mac_Safari.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Mac_Desktop.mov

@rohit9625 rohit9625 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 18, 2025 15:58
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from allgandalf April 18, 2025 15:58
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

@allgandalf Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team April 18, 2025 15:58
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @s77rt, I created the PR with changes proposed on my proposal. Let's discuss what we were talking about.

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

I removed the undesired diffs. Is it looking good now, @s77rt?

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 20, 2025

Yes looks good. You can try confirm if it's working by removing node_modules/react-native and then run npm install, you should be able to see a message if the patch was applied correctly or not

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

rohit9625 commented Apr 20, 2025

Yes looks good. You can try confirm if it's working by removing node_modules/react-native and then run npm install, you should be able to see a message if the patch was applied correctly or not

Yes, I've tried it and the patch applied successfully. Thanks for helping me with this, I learned something new :)

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 20, 2025

@rohit9625 Can you try paste images into TextInputs that do not use markdown

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

rohit9625 commented Apr 20, 2025

Any refs to such text inputs? Are you facing some issues?

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is happening on main when pasting image Search Field:

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 20, 2025

Those TextInputs do not use the onPaste event and thus as per the implemented solution it won't return true. That's why I suggested to make a re-write so that we return true regardless of the onPaste event.

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

rohit9625 commented Apr 20, 2025

Those TextInputs do not use the onPaste event and thus as per the implemented solution it won't return true. That's why I suggested to make a re-write so that we return true regardless of the onPaste event.

Got it. So I should be re-writing the method to return regardless of the onPasteWatcher. Thank you so much :)

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @s77rt, what do you think about this variant?
It returns true for both text and URI because the paste is eventually handled by our code and shouldn't call the default onTextContextMenuItem(), right?

  public boolean onTextContextMenuItem(int id) {
    if (id == android.R.id.paste || id == android.R.id.pasteAsPlainText) {
      id = android.R.id.pasteAsPlainText;
      ClipboardManager clipboardManager =
          (ClipboardManager) getContext().getSystemService(Context.CLIPBOARD_SERVICE);
      ClipData clipData = clipboardManager.getPrimaryClip();
      String type = null;
      String data = null;
      if (clipData.getDescription().hasMimeType(ClipDescription.MIMETYPE_TEXT_PLAIN)) {
        type = ClipDescription.MIMETYPE_TEXT_PLAIN;
        data = clipData.getItemAt(0).getText().toString();
      } else {
        Uri itemUri = clipData.getItemAt(0).getUri();
        if (itemUri != null) {
          ContentResolver cr = getReactContext(this).getContentResolver();
          type = cr.getType(itemUri);
          data = itemUri.toString();
        }
      }
      if (type != null && data != null && mPasteWatcher != null) {
        mPasteWatcher.onPaste(type, data);
      }
      return true
    }
    return super.onTextContextMenuItem(id);
  }

Or this one? It only returns true if clipboard content has URI that might point to any binary data?

public boolean onTextContextMenuItem(int id) {
    if (id == android.R.id.paste || id == android.R.id.pasteAsPlainText) {
      id = android.R.id.pasteAsPlainText;

      ClipboardManager clipboardManager =
            (ClipboardManager) getContext().getSystemService(Context.CLIPBOARD_SERVICE);
      ContentResolver cr = getReactContext(this).getContentResolver();
      ClipData clipData = clipboardManager.getPrimaryClip();

      if (clipData != null) {
        ClipData.Item item = clipData.getItemAt(0);
        Uri uri = item.getUri();
        String type = null;
        String data = null;

        if (uri != null) {
          type = cr.getType(uri);
          data = itemUri.toString();
          if (mPasteWatcher != null) {
            mPasteWatcher.onPaste(type, data);
          }
          return true;
        }

        if (clipData.getDescription().hasMimeType(ClipDescription.MIMETYPE_TEXT_PLAIN)) {
          type = ClipDescription.MIMETYPE_TEXT_PLAIN;
          data = item.getText().toString();
          if (mPasteWatcher != null) {
            mPasteWatcher.onPaste(type, data);
          }
        }
      }
    }
    return super.onTextContextMenuItem(id);
  }

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 20, 2025

i think the second one is correct. The custom handling is only for files just to prevent raw content pasting. You should also state that in a comment as it may not be clear

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

i think the second one is correct. The custom handling is only for files just to prevent raw content pasting. You should also state that in a comment as it may not be clear

Okay, let's go with the second one and I'll also write appropriate comments. Thanks once again :)

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit9625 is this PR ready for final review? I'll ask for adhoc builds after you confirm

Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @Beamanator has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @allgandalf, I am pushing the changes within 20 mins. What is this workflow running?

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

I saw a 👍 to my message earlier from you so i asked for a test build, if you are still pushing changes, lets build again after you're done

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @allgandalf, I am pushing the changes within 20 mins. What is this workflow running?

Edit: I wanted to test the pasting image in both markdown enabled and disabled text inputs but the build was falling which happens very often on my system. Now, it's resolved and will be update you here shortly :)

This comment has been minimized.

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

I saw a 👍 to my message earlier from you so i asked for a test build, if you are still pushing changes, lets build again after you're done

Yeah, I misread the message. I thought you ask me let you know when the PR is ready. My bad :(

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @allgandalf, I pushed the recent changes and tested for both type of text fields. It's working as expected

After_onPaste_Patch_Fix.mp4

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Will wait for the tests to pass and ask for adhoc again

Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @Beamanator has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
Android 🤖🔄 iOS 🍎🔄
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/60501-hybrid/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/60501-hybrid/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
N/A N/A
N/A N/A

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit9625 can you please check on the ^ android build as well

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's working as expected, @allgandalf

Expensify_Adhoc_Build_Test.mp4

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

allgandalf commented Apr 22, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-04-24.at.2.15.45.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-04-24.at.2.28.22.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-04-24.at.12.33.03.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-04-24.at.12.34.12.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-04-24.at.11.53.02.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-04-24.at.11.50.10.AM.mov

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@rohit9625 can you please update the testing steps to specify that we need a samsung android device to test this?

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

I added that as a prerequisite. Is that good @allgandalf?

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from Beamanator April 24, 2025 08:59
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Beamanator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, do we also want to open an issue / PR in the upstream repo for this?

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

YEssssssssssss! @rohit9625 can you please do that :))

@Beamanator Beamanator merged commit d629de0 into Expensify:main Apr 24, 2025
16 checks passed
@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Merging but let's not forget! 🙏

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

YEssssssssssss! @rohit9625 can you please do that :))

Well, the PR which added the onPaste feature is still not merged. So, we can't create a separate issue. I think @s77rt will take care of this in his PR.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Apr 24, 2025

The upstream PR is stale as there is no movement on the proposal react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#804

@rohit9625
Copy link
Contributor Author

The upstream PR is stale as there is no movement on the proposal react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#804

No problem, you did a great job in that PR. They'll definitely respond :)

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.1.33-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.1.35-1 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.1.36-3 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.1.37-1 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.1.37-3 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants