[OP] Address feedback for Dashboard #2747
[OP] Address feedback for Dashboard #2747tovaz92 wants to merge 150 commits intov0.19-operationalfrom
Conversation
…e-DT/AQUA into dashbrd-feedback-v0.19-op
…e-DT/AQUA into dashbrd-feedback-v0.19-op
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v0.19-operational #2747 +/- ##
====================================================
Coverage ? 72.56%
====================================================
Files ? 122
Lines ? 11826
Branches ? 2228
====================================================
Hits ? 8582
Misses ? 2362
Partials ? 882 |
|
Before merging this let's remember that many of these need to be implemented in a separate PR also for the main |
|
I would also wait a discussion with ECMWF to be sure we do not to modify things twice |
|
removed tropical rainfall from the config analysis file since it is not working anyway |
|
I had to deactivate multilevel trends , since they plot the surface continents also at depth |
|
@ghossh the multilevel trends were plotting surface land/sea masks also at depth, which is misleading. There is an additional severe problem though: Here is exactly what the
To summarize: there is only one colorbar per variable but each depth actually uses a different range. The colorbar itself does not correspond to the actual colorbar of the panels in the last row, since it was computed with the symmetric option while the panels were plotted without. To be done: implement a single set of symmetric vmin and vmax for each variable (one for T and one for S) , pass these vmin ad vmax to |
|
Thanks Jost, I'm checking it now. |
|
Hi @ghossh I have other few comments on MLD plots
|
|
@oloapinivad, can you please share with me the analysis results dashboard link or location? I can show it to Pablo |
|
Hi @oloapinivad |
But we need it for comparison between models, if the model is underestimating we need to see it clearly. What about the regions seasons? |
|
Hi, just to comment that JJA is the season where the MLD is deeper in the Southern Ocean, and DJF is the same for the Northern Hemisphere. For the default figures, it might be better to show wider areas that contain the full Southern Ocean and the Artic+North Atlantic, so we can see the deep water convection regions in just two plots. I would keep 2000m as the maximum MLD in the Northern Hemisphere, and 1000m in the Southern Ocean. |
|
Thanks @portegam, thanks for confirming the seasons. I totally agree on both your comments concerning default regions, it would be great if this can be implemented. Ideally we could use a polar projection. |
|
Hi @jhardenberg, 2e0e0cc should stabilize vmax and vmin definitions in multilevel trends. Feel free to suggest if you see any more change is needed. Thanks! |
|
@oloapinivad why did you have to remove the ref list functionality in plot_timeseries? |
I did not remove it. I tried to use it and then realize it was not implemented, please check the main, there is a #TODO flag https://github.com/DestinE-Climate-DT/AQUA-diagnostics/blob/d44b7d977c50987e1d69887c328945af3245d319/aqua/diagnostics/timeseries/plot_timeseries.py#L132 |
|
@silviacaprioli it looks as if titles now say "Nino 3.4 index" but descriptions still say "ENSO index" |
|
@silviacaprioli false alarm... I guess old and new figures got mixed .... please ignore for now |
|
ok @tovaz92 do not look at the seaice figures...the diagnostic actually crashed and did not produce new figs....to be investigated |
|
@tovaz92 ok, seaice this time ran correctly and I see new colormaps |
|
A legend still says "Linear regression of sea surface temperature with ENSO index " |

As per title we address here all the comments and feedback to improve v0.19 for the DESP dashboard