Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(db-checker): Extension of "db reachable" #11651

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kiblik
Copy link
Contributor

@kiblik kiblik commented Jan 25, 2025

Reopen #10497

Extend wait_for_database_to_be_reachable. Not only for simple operation but check that DB is compatible.

Added based on #10490

This PR also contains changes from #11650 because they are needed for proper testing of this functionality.

@kiblik kiblik force-pushed the db_checker branch 2 times, most recently from ac089d0 to 1cf37e0 Compare January 26, 2025 22:21
@kiblik kiblik marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2025 22:27
@kiblik kiblik requested review from mtesauro, Maffooch and cneill and removed request for mtesauro January 28, 2025 15:40
Copy link
Contributor

@mtesauro mtesauro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ jobs:
./helm/defectdojo \
--set django.ingress.enabled=true \
--set imagePullPolicy=Never \
--set initializer.keepSeconds="x" \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this value intentional? Docs suggest this ttlSecondsAfterFinished should be an integer - I'm not sure what it would do with a value of "x"?

ttlSecondsAfterFinished: {{ .Values.initializer.keepSeconds }}

Screenshot 2025-02-03 at 17 50 12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants