Skip to content

Extending the type preservation check #188

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Extending the type preservation check #188

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@Gaspi
Copy link
Collaborator

@Gaspi Gaspi commented Sep 17, 2019 •
edited
Loading

This is meant to be merged after #189 to better handle the several categories of inferred constraints.
In particular it seems reasonable to

  • use 2)
  • have a naive usage of 3) similar to the way Jui-Hsuan handles 4)

This PR is related to #183

@Gaspi Gaspi added the WIP Work In Progress - Not ready to be merged yet label Nov 15, 2019
@Gaspi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Gaspi commented Dec 6, 2019

This is now merged with PR #189

@Gaspi Gaspi closed this Dec 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

WIP Work In Progress - Not ready to be merged yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Gaspi