ci: replace use of cargo cross for centos7 tests by ekump · Pull Request #1675 · DataDog/libdatadog

ekump · 2026-03-05T21:22:48Z

What does this PR do?

The Centos7 tests we run uses cargo cross. However, we don't actually do any cross-compilation. The host is x86_64 and the build target is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, the same architecture. What this test is doing is running tests for the x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu build in a CentOS7 environment with the older 2.17 glibc. Cross makes it easier to leverage the centOS7 docker container to run tests, but isn't really necessary. Using cargo cross means we can can't use nextest as the test runner. Without nextest we don't get process isolation for tests and we can't generate a junit.xml file to upload to CI Viz / test optimization. We can just handle spinning up the docker container ourselves.

Motivation

What inspired you to submit this pull request?

Additional Notes

The nextest binary needs to be the musl variant since the regular version requires glibc 2.25+, which isn't available in CentOS7

As a future enhancement we should look into not building the docker image on every run.

How to test the change?

Observe the CI runs

pr-commenter · 2026-03-05T22:11:26Z

Benchmarks

Comparison

Benchmark execution time: 2026-03-07 02:53:10

Comparing candidate commit 1eb41be in PR branch ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test with baseline commit 7e909c0 in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 57 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Candidate

Candidate benchmark details

Group 1

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
redis/obfuscate_redis_string	execution_time	32.695µs	33.528µs ± 1.141µs	32.817µs ± 0.064µs	34.824µs	35.480µs	35.948µs	36.212µs	10.35%	0.990	-0.856	3.39%	0.081µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
redis/obfuscate_redis_string	execution_time	[33.370µs; 33.686µs] or [-0.472%; +0.472%]	None	None	None

Group 2

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
benching serializing traces from their internal representation to msgpack	execution_time	13.958ms	14.024ms ± 0.032ms	14.019ms ± 0.015ms	14.034ms	14.073ms	14.140ms	14.204ms	1.32%	2.129	7.154	0.22%	0.002ms	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
benching serializing traces from their internal representation to msgpack	execution_time	[14.020ms; 14.029ms] or [-0.031%; +0.031%]	None	None	None

Group 3

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Lo...	execution_time	185.334µs	185.757µs ± 0.410µs	185.701µs ± 0.142µs	185.871µs	186.098µs	186.240µs	190.822µs	2.76%	9.523	114.978	0.22%	0.029µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Lo...	throughput	5240481.778op/s	5383403.325op/s ± 11635.577op/s	5385007.506op/s ± 4108.061op/s	5388567.044op/s	5391894.702op/s	5394923.761op/s	5395656.766op/s	0.20%	-9.350	112.115	0.22%	822.760op/s	1	200
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/bad-name	execution_time	17.828µs	17.917µs ± 0.046µs	17.912µs ± 0.033µs	17.952µs	17.985µs	18.019µs	18.075µs	0.91%	0.279	0.048	0.25%	0.003µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/bad-name	throughput	55325986.290op/s	55811839.606op/s ± 141643.846op/s	55828232.964op/s ± 101941.433op/s	55909991.493op/s	56067192.300op/s	56086509.152op/s	56091356.322op/s	0.47%	-0.264	0.023	0.25%	10015.732op/s	1	200
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/good	execution_time	10.269µs	10.346µs ± 0.040µs	10.340µs ± 0.022µs	10.366µs	10.426µs	10.460µs	10.473µs	1.28%	0.754	0.587	0.39%	0.003µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/good	throughput	95486338.893op/s	96659270.824op/s ± 373483.964op/s	96711513.249op/s ± 208107.466op/s	96888689.719op/s	97197755.432op/s	97297353.491op/s	97382564.804op/s	0.69%	-0.731	0.542	0.39%	26409.304op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Lo...	execution_time	[185.700µs; 185.814µs] or [-0.031%; +0.031%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Long-.Too-Lo...	throughput	[5381790.746op/s; 5385015.904op/s] or [-0.030%; +0.030%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/bad-name	execution_time	[17.911µs; 17.924µs] or [-0.035%; +0.035%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/bad-name	throughput	[55792209.131op/s; 55831470.080op/s] or [-0.035%; +0.035%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/good	execution_time	[10.340µs; 10.351µs] or [-0.054%; +0.054%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/good	throughput	[96607509.539op/s; 96711032.109op/s] or [-0.054%; +0.054%]	None	None	None

Group 4

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
two way interface	execution_time	18.005µs	25.938µs ± 9.977µs	18.493µs ± 0.447µs	33.785µs	43.102µs	57.661µs	73.154µs	295.58%	1.239	2.018	38.37%	0.705µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
two way interface	execution_time	[24.555µs; 27.321µs] or [-5.331%; +5.331%]	None	None	None

Group 5

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
normalization/normalize_trace/test_trace	execution_time	240.540ns	249.472ns ± 12.105ns	244.066ns ± 2.254ns	249.907ns	283.545ns	288.585ns	296.015ns	21.28%	2.149	3.630	4.84%	0.856ns	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
normalization/normalize_trace/test_trace	execution_time	[247.794ns; 251.149ns] or [-0.673%; +0.673%]	None	None	None

Group 6

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
concentrator/add_spans_to_concentrator	execution_time	10.639ms	10.664ms ± 0.015ms	10.662ms ± 0.008ms	10.671ms	10.689ms	10.716ms	10.741ms	0.74%	1.470	4.398	0.14%	0.001ms	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
concentrator/add_spans_to_concentrator	execution_time	[10.662ms; 10.666ms] or [-0.019%; +0.019%]	None	None	None

Group 7

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
benching string interning on wordpress profile	execution_time	160.690µs	161.215µs ± 0.428µs	161.122µs ± 0.120µs	161.251µs	161.922µs	163.134µs	164.443µs	2.06%	3.783	20.674	0.26%	0.030µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
benching string interning on wordpress profile	execution_time	[161.156µs; 161.274µs] or [-0.037%; +0.037%]	None	None	None

Group 8

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
profile_add_sample2_frames_x1000	execution_time	738.975µs	739.932µs ± 0.546µs	739.934µs ± 0.335µs	740.216µs	740.778µs	741.386µs	743.760µs	0.52%	1.942	10.948	0.07%	0.039µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
profile_add_sample2_frames_x1000	execution_time	[739.856µs; 740.008µs] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None

Group 9

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
single_flag_killswitch/rules-based	execution_time	187.572ns	189.783ns ± 1.994ns	189.673ns ± 1.455ns	190.724ns	193.597ns	196.602ns	199.477ns	5.17%	1.554	3.465	1.05%	0.141ns	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
single_flag_killswitch/rules-based	execution_time	[189.507ns; 190.059ns] or [-0.146%; +0.146%]	None	None	None

Group 10

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
ip_address/quantize_peer_ip_address_benchmark	execution_time	4.924µs	4.999µs ± 0.049µs	4.982µs ± 0.039µs	5.048µs	5.080µs	5.084µs	5.090µs	2.17%	0.440	-1.226	0.97%	0.003µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
ip_address/quantize_peer_ip_address_benchmark	execution_time	[4.993µs; 5.006µs] or [-0.135%; +0.135%]	None	None	None

Group 11

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
receiver_entry_point/report/2597	execution_time	3.104ms	3.133ms ± 0.028ms	3.123ms ± 0.008ms	3.137ms	3.196ms	3.226ms	3.262ms	4.43%	1.984	3.818	0.88%	0.002ms	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
receiver_entry_point/report/2597	execution_time	[3.130ms; 3.137ms] or [-0.123%; +0.123%]	None	None	None

Group 12

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/A0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...	execution_time	534.271µs	535.347µs ± 0.862µs	535.131µs ± 0.349µs	535.537µs	537.378µs	538.608µs	539.354µs	0.79%	2.138	5.306	0.16%	0.061µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/A0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...	throughput	1854070.273op/s	1867951.828op/s ± 2996.266op/s	1868700.282op/s ± 1218.181op/s	1869725.552op/s	1870890.558op/s	1871313.125op/s	1871707.859op/s	0.16%	-2.124	5.237	0.16%	211.868op/s	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Data🐨dog🐶 繋がっ⛰てて	execution_time	380.893µs	381.580µs ± 0.298µs	381.580µs ± 0.211µs	381.785µs	382.066µs	382.213µs	382.406µs	0.22%	0.086	-0.432	0.08%	0.021µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Data🐨dog🐶 繋がっ⛰てて	throughput	2615023.515op/s	2620685.463op/s ± 2047.557op/s	2620681.679op/s ± 1448.580op/s	2622162.414op/s	2624027.887op/s	2625057.308op/s	2625405.939op/s	0.18%	-0.082	-0.433	0.08%	144.784op/s	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Test Conversion 0f Weird !@#$%^&**() Characters	execution_time	189.996µs	190.339µs ± 0.151µs	190.336µs ± 0.097µs	190.413µs	190.594µs	190.773µs	190.816µs	0.25%	0.667	0.695	0.08%	0.011µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Test Conversion 0f Weird !@#$%^&**() Characters	throughput	5240646.454op/s	5253799.667op/s ± 4159.610op/s	5253877.463op/s ± 2689.860op/s	5256696.982op/s	5259851.783op/s	5261081.672op/s	5263258.756op/s	0.18%	-0.661	0.684	0.08%	294.129op/s	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/[empty string]	execution_time	37.338µs	37.529µs ± 0.068µs	37.528µs ± 0.045µs	37.568µs	37.643µs	37.687µs	37.761µs	0.62%	0.159	0.423	0.18%	0.005µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/[empty string]	throughput	26482508.146op/s	26645829.192op/s ± 48368.185op/s	26646882.414op/s ± 32096.814op/s	26679306.517op/s	26719588.643op/s	26755422.456op/s	26782579.972op/s	0.51%	-0.146	0.415	0.18%	3420.147op/s	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/test_ASCII	execution_time	45.816µs	45.898µs ± 0.108µs	45.884µs ± 0.028µs	45.915µs	45.972µs	46.038µs	47.272µs	3.03%	10.522	131.111	0.23%	0.008µs	1	200
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/test_ASCII	throughput	21154038.306op/s	21787555.741op/s ± 49896.708op/s	21794089.443op/s ± 13532.043op/s	21805286.336op/s	21817315.034op/s	21820676.382op/s	21826466.588op/s	0.15%	-10.365	128.376	0.23%	3528.230op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/A0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...	execution_time	[535.228µs; 535.467µs] or [-0.022%; +0.022%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/A0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...	throughput	[1867536.574op/s; 1868367.082op/s] or [-0.022%; +0.022%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Data🐨dog🐶 繋がっ⛰てて	execution_time	[381.538µs; 381.621µs] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Data🐨dog🐶 繋がっ⛰てて	throughput	[2620401.691op/s; 2620969.235op/s] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Test Conversion 0f Weird !@#$%^&**() Characters	execution_time	[190.318µs; 190.359µs] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/Test Conversion 0f Weird !@#$%^&**() Characters	throughput	[5253223.185op/s; 5254376.149op/s] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/[empty string]	execution_time	[37.520µs; 37.539µs] or [-0.025%; +0.025%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/[empty string]	throughput	[26639125.827op/s; 26652532.557op/s] or [-0.025%; +0.025%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/test_ASCII	execution_time	[45.883µs; 45.913µs] or [-0.033%; +0.033%]	None	None	None
normalization/normalize_service/normalize_service/test_ASCII	throughput	[21780640.537op/s; 21794470.944op/s] or [-0.032%; +0.032%]	None	None	None

Group 13

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
sdk_test_data/rules-based	execution_time	144.215µs	145.912µs ± 1.744µs	145.653µs ± 0.528µs	146.119µs	147.504µs	152.328µs	161.831µs	11.11%	5.475	40.789	1.19%	0.123µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
sdk_test_data/rules-based	execution_time	[145.671µs; 146.154µs] or [-0.166%; +0.166%]	None	None	None

Group 14

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
sql/obfuscate_sql_string	execution_time	85.193µs	85.542µs ± 0.172µs	85.519µs ± 0.040µs	85.561µs	85.657µs	86.068µs	87.314µs	2.10%	7.100	64.752	0.20%	0.012µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
sql/obfuscate_sql_string	execution_time	[85.518µs; 85.565µs] or [-0.028%; +0.028%]	None	None	None

Group 15

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
write only interface	execution_time	1.240µs	3.208µs ± 1.396µs	2.998µs ± 0.025µs	3.026µs	3.675µs	13.715µs	14.721µs	390.98%	7.312	54.824	43.41%	0.099µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
write only interface	execution_time	[3.015µs; 3.402µs] or [-6.031%; +6.031%]	None	None	None

Group 16

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
profile_add_sample_frames_x1000	execution_time	4.202ms	4.206ms ± 0.008ms	4.205ms ± 0.001ms	4.207ms	4.211ms	4.215ms	4.307ms	2.43%	11.553	148.511	0.18%	0.001ms	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
profile_add_sample_frames_x1000	execution_time	[4.205ms; 4.207ms] or [-0.025%; +0.025%]	None	None	None

Group 17

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
benching deserializing traces from msgpack to their internal representation	execution_time	48.231ms	48.743ms ± 1.098ms	48.576ms ± 0.061ms	48.656ms	48.938ms	55.403ms	60.298ms	24.13%	8.413	75.099	2.25%	0.078ms	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
benching deserializing traces from msgpack to their internal representation	execution_time	[48.591ms; 48.895ms] or [-0.312%; +0.312%]	None	None	None

Group 18

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
credit_card/is_card_number/	execution_time	3.893µs	3.913µs ± 0.003µs	3.913µs ± 0.002µs	3.915µs	3.919µs	3.921µs	3.921µs	0.20%	-0.878	7.075	0.08%	0.000µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/	throughput	255033190.221op/s	255535616.453op/s ± 209439.270op/s	255540925.790op/s ± 126978.171op/s	255672949.802op/s	255807100.051op/s	255882956.415op/s	256870713.966op/s	0.52%	0.898	7.209	0.08%	14809.593op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/ 3782-8224-6310-005	execution_time	78.860µs	79.642µs ± 0.411µs	79.583µs ± 0.259µs	79.881µs	80.391µs	80.712µs	80.924µs	1.69%	0.559	-0.133	0.51%	0.029µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/ 3782-8224-6310-005	throughput	12357302.577op/s	12556581.917op/s ± 64639.419op/s	12565531.500op/s ± 40735.385op/s	12601791.979op/s	12645338.851op/s	12668203.664op/s	12680703.803op/s	0.92%	-0.535	-0.170	0.51%	4570.697op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/ 378282246310005	execution_time	72.304µs	73.000µs ± 0.393µs	72.936µs ± 0.272µs	73.235µs	73.718µs	74.059µs	74.175µs	1.70%	0.572	-0.063	0.54%	0.028µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/ 378282246310005	throughput	13481693.631op/s	13699072.783op/s ± 73515.243op/s	13710671.025op/s ± 51032.483op/s	13756565.285op/s	13805691.473op/s	13812329.200op/s	13830559.095op/s	0.87%	-0.546	-0.110	0.54%	5198.313op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631	execution_time	3.895µs	3.912µs ± 0.003µs	3.912µs ± 0.001µs	3.913µs	3.916µs	3.917µs	3.930µs	0.47%	0.360	16.357	0.07%	0.000µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631	throughput	254427734.116op/s	255624804.496op/s ± 179052.168op/s	255631375.787op/s ± 81409.138op/s	255711411.123op/s	255855634.430op/s	255924332.268op/s	256764030.141op/s	0.44%	-0.322	16.330	0.07%	12660.900op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/378282246310005	execution_time	69.163µs	69.736µs ± 0.371µs	69.698µs ± 0.260µs	69.957µs	70.377µs	70.663µs	71.229µs	2.20%	0.771	0.640	0.53%	0.026µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/378282246310005	throughput	14039188.640op/s	14340206.806op/s ± 76045.960op/s	14347691.906op/s ± 53448.266op/s	14401249.701op/s	14441069.246op/s	14453212.508op/s	14458564.415op/s	0.77%	-0.739	0.537	0.53%	5377.261op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631000521389798	execution_time	52.148µs	52.233µs ± 0.104µs	52.224µs ± 0.021µs	52.241µs	52.288µs	52.410µs	53.227µs	1.92%	8.110	72.768	0.20%	0.007µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631000521389798	throughput	18787466.685op/s	19144949.575op/s ± 37483.184op/s	19148408.444op/s ± 7750.336op/s	19156530.480op/s	19168004.766op/s	19170904.836op/s	19176213.824op/s	0.15%	-8.056	72.092	0.20%	2650.461op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/x371413321323331	execution_time	6.028µs	6.039µs ± 0.013µs	6.036µs ± 0.003µs	6.039µs	6.072µs	6.110µs	6.126µs	1.48%	3.826	16.762	0.22%	0.001µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number/x371413321323331	throughput	163250724.129op/s	165586919.105op/s ± 363058.904op/s	165673824.257op/s ± 81862.767op/s	165745607.517op/s	165818079.793op/s	165882659.906op/s	165888978.601op/s	0.13%	-3.799	16.505	0.22%	25672.141op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/	execution_time	3.893µs	3.912µs ± 0.003µs	3.912µs ± 0.002µs	3.914µs	3.916µs	3.918µs	3.920µs	0.18%	-1.845	14.463	0.07%	0.000µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/	throughput	255130726.809op/s	255595702.595op/s ± 173166.251op/s	255594631.142op/s ± 99462.326op/s	255695218.502op/s	255821684.143op/s	255963419.891op/s	256895101.703op/s	0.51%	1.871	14.688	0.07%	12244.703op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 3782-8224-6310-005	execution_time	64.136µs	64.434µs ± 0.147µs	64.407µs ± 0.092µs	64.521µs	64.693µs	64.863µs	64.902µs	0.77%	0.715	0.530	0.23%	0.010µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 3782-8224-6310-005	throughput	15407833.501op/s	15519863.293op/s ± 35283.053op/s	15526342.256op/s ± 22275.981op/s	15543694.135op/s	15569019.843op/s	15582027.039op/s	15591901.566op/s	0.42%	-0.701	0.502	0.23%	2494.889op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 378282246310005	execution_time	57.798µs	58.069µs ± 0.161µs	58.026µs ± 0.087µs	58.147µs	58.380µs	58.547µs	58.631µs	1.04%	1.105	1.047	0.28%	0.011µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 378282246310005	throughput	17055697.599op/s	17221058.643op/s ± 47622.536op/s	17233641.862op/s ± 25777.790op/s	17254981.323op/s	17277846.781op/s	17289398.789op/s	17301771.701op/s	0.40%	-1.089	1.001	0.28%	3367.422op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631	execution_time	3.892µs	3.912µs ± 0.003µs	3.911µs ± 0.002µs	3.913µs	3.916µs	3.919µs	3.921µs	0.24%	-1.183	11.828	0.07%	0.000µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631	throughput	255067203.774op/s	255645989.029op/s ± 180003.737op/s	255667888.114op/s ± 98969.346op/s	255749461.946op/s	255854218.689op/s	255923712.130op/s	256925508.985op/s	0.49%	1.209	12.018	0.07%	12728.186op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/378282246310005	execution_time	54.586µs	54.976µs ± 0.284µs	54.965µs ± 0.226µs	55.141µs	55.442µs	55.780µs	55.853µs	1.61%	0.751	0.228	0.52%	0.020µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/378282246310005	throughput	17904294.463op/s	18190094.009op/s ± 93628.570op/s	18193255.768op/s ± 74697.280op/s	18278332.250op/s	18307636.085op/s	18315998.019op/s	18319638.229op/s	0.69%	-0.726	0.164	0.51%	6620.540op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631000521389798	execution_time	52.150µs	52.217µs ± 0.041µs	52.206µs ± 0.021µs	52.235µs	52.294µs	52.326µs	52.446µs	0.46%	1.573	4.505	0.08%	0.003µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631000521389798	throughput	19067200.760op/s	19150797.601op/s ± 14838.976op/s	19154754.555op/s ± 7783.641op/s	19161236.818op/s	19168622.881op/s	19170342.657op/s	19175459.247op/s	0.11%	-1.564	4.443	0.08%	1049.274op/s	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/x371413321323331	execution_time	6.028µs	6.037µs ± 0.011µs	6.034µs ± 0.002µs	6.037µs	6.054µs	6.074µs	6.121µs	1.44%	4.654	25.884	0.19%	0.001µs	1	200
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/x371413321323331	throughput	163374171.292op/s	165657409.620op/s ± 305718.413op/s	165733308.917op/s ± 58757.933op/s	165785804.590op/s	165842259.925op/s	165857642.165op/s	165884335.596op/s	0.09%	-4.620	25.490	0.18%	21617.556op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
credit_card/is_card_number/	execution_time	[3.913µs; 3.914µs] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/	throughput	[255506590.185op/s; 255564642.722op/s] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/ 3782-8224-6310-005	execution_time	[79.585µs; 79.699µs] or [-0.072%; +0.072%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/ 3782-8224-6310-005	throughput	[12547623.515op/s; 12565540.319op/s] or [-0.071%; +0.071%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/ 378282246310005	execution_time	[72.945µs; 73.054µs] or [-0.075%; +0.075%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/ 378282246310005	throughput	[13688884.277op/s; 13709261.288op/s] or [-0.074%; +0.074%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631	execution_time	[3.912µs; 3.912µs] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631	throughput	[255599989.587op/s; 255649619.404op/s] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/378282246310005	execution_time	[69.685µs; 69.787µs] or [-0.074%; +0.074%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/378282246310005	throughput	[14329667.567op/s; 14350746.045op/s] or [-0.073%; +0.073%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631000521389798	execution_time	[52.219µs; 52.248µs] or [-0.028%; +0.028%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/37828224631000521389798	throughput	[19139754.766op/s; 19150144.383op/s] or [-0.027%; +0.027%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/x371413321323331	execution_time	[6.037µs; 6.041µs] or [-0.031%; +0.031%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number/x371413321323331	throughput	[165536602.633op/s; 165637235.577op/s] or [-0.030%; +0.030%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/	execution_time	[3.912µs; 3.913µs] or [-0.009%; +0.009%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/	throughput	[255571703.418op/s; 255619701.772op/s] or [-0.009%; +0.009%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 3782-8224-6310-005	execution_time	[64.414µs; 64.454µs] or [-0.032%; +0.032%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 3782-8224-6310-005	throughput	[15514973.402op/s; 15524753.185op/s] or [-0.032%; +0.032%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 378282246310005	execution_time	[58.047µs; 58.091µs] or [-0.038%; +0.038%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/ 378282246310005	throughput	[17214458.618op/s; 17227658.669op/s] or [-0.038%; +0.038%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631	execution_time	[3.911µs; 3.912µs] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631	throughput	[255621042.242op/s; 255670935.816op/s] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/378282246310005	execution_time	[54.937µs; 55.016µs] or [-0.072%; +0.072%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/378282246310005	throughput	[18177117.990op/s; 18203070.029op/s] or [-0.071%; +0.071%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631000521389798	execution_time	[52.212µs; 52.223µs] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/37828224631000521389798	throughput	[19148741.062op/s; 19152854.141op/s] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/x371413321323331	execution_time	[6.035µs; 6.038µs] or [-0.026%; +0.026%]	None	None	None
credit_card/is_card_number_no_luhn/x371413321323331	throughput	[165615039.988op/s; 165699779.252op/s] or [-0.026%; +0.026%]	None	None	None

Group 19

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1eb41be`	1772851054	ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
tags/replace_trace_tags	execution_time	2.321µs	2.394µs ± 0.018µs	2.397µs ± 0.005µs	2.403µs	2.414µs	2.420µs	2.421µs	1.01%	-2.351	5.983	0.74%	0.001µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
tags/replace_trace_tags	execution_time	[2.392µs; 2.397µs] or [-0.103%; +0.103%]	None	None	None

Baseline

Omitted due to size.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-03-05T22:16:05Z

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	8.70 MB	8.70 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	98.65 MB	98.65 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	114.30 MB	114.30 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	11.29 MB	11.29 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

libdatadog-x64-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	27.17 MB	27.17 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	76.26 KB	76.26 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	186.04 MB	186.04 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	917.20 MB	917.20 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	9.93 MB	9.93 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	76.26 KB	76.26 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	24.76 MB	24.76 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	51.43 MB	51.43 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

libdatadog-x86-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	22.97 MB	22.97 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	77.44 KB	77.44 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	190.24 MB	190.25 MB	+0% (+8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	900.85 MB	900.85 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	7.53 MB	7.53 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	77.44 KB	77.44 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	26.52 MB	26.52 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	47.07 MB	47.07 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

x86_64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	86.54 MB	86.54 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	10.23 MB	10.23 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	107.16 MB	107.16 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	11.98 MB	11.98 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

codecov-commenter · 2026-03-05T23:24:41Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.38%. Comparing base (7e909c0) to head (1eb41be).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1675   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.37%   71.38%           
=======================================
  Files         427      427           
  Lines       62903    62903           
=======================================
+ Hits        44899    44902    +3     
+ Misses      18004    18001    -3

Components	Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker	`62.98% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
libdd-crashtracker-ffi	`16.56% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-alloc	`98.77% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-data-pipeline	`88.02% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi	`75.72% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-common	`79.73% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-common-ffi	`73.40% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry	`62.48% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry-ffi	`16.75% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-dogstatsd-client	`82.64% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-ipc	`80.35% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-profiling	`81.59% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
libdd-profiling-ffi	`63.65% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-sidecar	`34.48% <ø> (ø)`
datdog-sidecar-ffi	`16.55% <ø> (ø)`
spawn-worker	`54.69% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-tinybytes	`93.16% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-normalization	`81.71% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-obfuscation	`94.69% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-protobuf	`68.25% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-utils	`89.08% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-tracer-flare	`88.95% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-log	`74.69% <ø> (ø)`

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

run centOS7 tests. And switch to nextest as a test runner for CentOS7 so we can upload junit.xml files

iunanua

LGTM

so, centos7 job can use the same cache as ubuntu 😉

#1638 (comment)

ekump · 2026-03-10T19:11:32Z

so, centos7 job can use the same cache as ubuntu 😉

@iunanua - In theory, yes it should just work.

gyuheon0h · 2026-03-11T01:12:14Z

Thanks for this!

# What does this PR do? Bump to 29.0.0 [feat(profiling)!: add Tracepoint sample type](#1676) [feat(obfuscation/redis): Reach feature parity on redis obfuscation [APMSP-2668]](#1632) [fix(sidecar): Handle backpressure more gracefully](#1682) [feat(trace-protobuf)!: Add two fields to ClientGroupedStats [SVLS-8627]](#1630) [chore: exclude libdatadog from ADMS auto generated PRs for dependency updates](#1688) [chore(ci): run crashtracking ffi example tests in CI](#1687) [fix(crashtracking): use libunwind to unwind frames](#1663) [feat: publish tracer metadata as OTel process ctx](#1658) [ci: run thread count test in own process](#1693) [feat(obfuscation/json): Init json obfuscation [APMSP-2665]](#1635) [chore(ci): add final_status property on junit XML [APMSP-2610]](#1681) [refactor(data-pipeline-ffi): move macro definitions for better reuse](#1699) [fix(obfuscation/memcached): fuzzing fix](#1695) [ci: replace use of cargo cross for centos7 tests](#1675) #1702 (comment) [feat(stats_exporter)!: add process tags to CSS payloads](#1709) # Motivation I mainly am creating this to use the new unwinding from ucontext for crashtracking # Additional Notes Anything else we should know when reviewing? # How to test the change? Describe here in detail how the change can be validated. [APMSP-2668]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-2668?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [SVLS-8627]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/SVLS-8627?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ [APMSP-2665]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-2665?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ Co-authored-by: gyuheon.oh <gyuheon.oh@datadoghq.com>

github-actions bot added the ci-build label Mar 5, 2026

ekump force-pushed the ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test branch 2 times, most recently from 299f9a9 to 0635890 Compare March 5, 2026 21:45

ekump changed the title ~~run centos tests with nextest~~ ci: replace use of cargo cross for centos7 tests Mar 7, 2026

Replace use of cargo cross with manually starting docker container to

1eb41be

run centOS7 tests. And switch to nextest as a test runner for CentOS7 so we can upload junit.xml files

ekump force-pushed the ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test branch from 052d18e to 1eb41be Compare March 7, 2026 02:37

ekump marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2026 03:07

ekump requested a review from a team as a code owner March 7, 2026 03:07

yannham mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2026

ci: run thread count test in own process #1693

Merged

iunanua approved these changes Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

paullegranddc approved these changes Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 bot added mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress and removed mergequeue-status: queued labels Mar 10, 2026

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot merged commit b04809b into main Mar 10, 2026
76 checks passed

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 bot removed the mergequeue-status: in_progress label Mar 10, 2026

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot deleted the ekump/APMSP-2688-use-nextest-with-cross-for-centos-test branch March 10, 2026 19:48

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 bot added the mergequeue-status: done label Mar 10, 2026

gyuheon0h mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2026

chore(cargo): bump to 29.0.0 #1702

Merged

Conversation

ekump commented Mar 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

How to test the change?

Uh oh!

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Comparison

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Candidate

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Group 5

Group 6

Group 7

Group 8

Group 9

Group 10

Group 11

Group 12

Group 13

Group 14

Group 15

Group 16

Group 17

Group 18

Group 19

Baseline

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts bot commented Mar 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Mar 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

iunanua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ekump commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

gyuheon0h commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

ekump commented Mar 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts bot commented Mar 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov-commenter commented Mar 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading