Skip to content

chore: improve error tracking getting started doc #4676

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dubloom
Copy link
Contributor

@dubloom dubloom commented May 21, 2025

What does this PR do?
Address the comments of Update document v2.16.0

Motivation:

Change log entry
No.

@dubloom dubloom requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2025 14:00
@dubloom dubloom requested a review from domalessi May 21, 2025 14:00
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs Involves documentation label May 21, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.72%. Comparing base (5a070a9) to head (0245912).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4676      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.73%   97.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1442     1455      +13     
  Lines       87249    87359     +110     
  Branches     4488     4490       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        85276    85375      +99     
- Misses       1973     1984      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link
Contributor

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented May 21, 2025

Datadog Report

Branch report: dubloom/fix/improve-documentation
Commit report: 0245912
Test service: dd-trace-rb

✅ 0 Failed, 21295 Passed, 1376 Skipped, 3m 49.31s Total Time

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 21, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-05-22 09:02:06

Comparing candidate commit 0245912 in PR branch dubloom/fix/improve-documentation with baseline commit 5a070a9 in branch master.

Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 38 metrics, 6 unstable metrics.

scenario:profiling - Allocations ()

  • 🟩 throughput [+640054.277op/s; +647228.475op/s] or [+23.745%; +24.011%]

@buraizu buraizu self-assigned this May 21, 2025
@buraizu buraizu added the editorial review Waiting for a review from the docs team label May 21, 2025
@buraizu
Copy link
Contributor

buraizu commented May 21, 2025

Created DOCS-10990 for documentation team review (once the open feedback has been addressed).

@domalessi domalessi removed their request for review May 22, 2025 15:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Involves documentation editorial review Waiting for a review from the docs team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants