Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OTEL-2362] Test metric origins in otel e2e test #33011

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

songy23
Copy link
Member

@songy23 songy23 commented Jan 15, 2025

What does this PR do?

Add a new otel e2e test on host metrics receiver and validate expected metric origins.

Motivation

Test metric origins e2e

@songy23 songy23 added changelog/no-changelog team/opentelemetry OpenTelemetry team qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Jan 15, 2025
@songy23 songy23 added this to the 7.63.0 milestone Jan 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Jan 15, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor cb0d65b6920ecd830901149a319119d0b1b190a4

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 927.45MB 927.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 937.11MB 937.11MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 937.11MB 937.11MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 914.54MB 914.54MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 924.19MB 924.19MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 58.95MB 58.95MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 59.02MB 59.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 59.02MB 59.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.46MB 56.46MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 478.37MB 478.37MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 94.01MB 94.01MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 94.07MB 94.07MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 94.07MB 94.07MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 90.05MB 90.05MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 90.12MB 90.12MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=53399108 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit bd2f757

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: f78d507c-9963-41ec-9343-c3a0615a1c58

Baseline: cb0d65b
Comparison: bd2f757
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.95 [-2.26, +4.16] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.52 [-0.19, +1.23] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.39 [+0.30, +0.48] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.38 [-0.40, +1.16] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.34 [+0.28, +0.39] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.04 [-0.80, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.60, +0.67] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.91, +0.97] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.65, +0.68] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.10, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.88, +0.89] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.12 [-0.58, +0.35] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.22 [-0.26, -0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization -0.22 [-0.36, -0.08] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.99 [-1.79, -0.18] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@songy23 songy23 force-pushed the yang.song/OTEL-2362 branch from 1e1d3db to a8cf74b Compare January 16, 2025 15:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly and removed medium review PR review might take time labels Jan 16, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Jan 16, 2025

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 53399108 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@songy23 songy23 force-pushed the yang.song/OTEL-2362 branch from ff0f0c6 to bd2f757 Compare January 18, 2025 00:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/opentelemetry OpenTelemetry team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant