Add unit tests and enhance PR help message functionality #1378

mrT23 · 2024-12-01T14:44:04Z

PR Type

Tests, Enhancement

Description

Added unit tests for PRHelpMessage functionality.
Enhanced requirements.txt with pytest-asyncio dependency.
Validated PRHelpMessage initialization and error handling.
Improved test coverage for header extraction logic.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Tests

test_pr_help_message.py Add unit tests for `PRHelpMessage` functionality tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py Added unit tests for `extract_header` function. Tested `PRHelpMessage` initialization with mocked dependencies. Validated error handling for missing OpenAI API key. Utilized `pytest` and `pytest-asyncio` for asynchronous testing.	+66/-0

Dependencies

requirements.txt Update dependencies to include `pytest-asyncio` requirements.txt Added `pytest-asyncio` dependency for asynchronous testing.	+1/-0

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2024-12-01T14:44:26Z

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit `276a869`)

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
🏅 Score: 95
🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Test Coverage The test cases cover basic functionality but could be enhanced by testing error cases and edge cases for the extract_header function Mock Validation The test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key test could validate the exact error message content to ensure proper user communication

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2024-12-01T14:45:01Z

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit `2f746cc`)

Action: build-and-test
Failed stage: Build dev docker [❌]
Failure summary: The action failed due to a dependency conflict during the installation of Python packages: The package `pr-agent` version 0.2.4 requires `pytest` version 7.4.0. The package `pytest-asyncio` version 0.24.0 requires `pytest` to be between versions 8.2 and 9. These conflicting requirements for `pytest` make it impossible to resolve dependencies, leading to a failure in the package installation process.
Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 1018: #12 15.41 Downloading PyJWT-2.10.1-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (4.0 kB) 1019: #12 15.45 Collecting pynacl>=1.4.0 (from PyGithub==1.59.*->pr-agent==0.2.4) 1020: #12 15.45 Downloading PyNaCl-1.5.0-cp36-abi3-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.manylinux_2_24_x86_64.whl.metadata (8.6 kB) 1021: #12 15.51 Collecting iniconfig (from pytest==7.4.0->pr-agent==0.2.4) 1022: #12 15.51 Downloading iniconfig-2.0.0-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (2.6 kB) 1023: #12 15.55 Collecting pluggy<2.0,>=0.12 (from pytest==7.4.0->pr-agent==0.2.4) 1024: #12 15.55 Downloading pluggy-1.5.0-py3-none-any.whl.metadata (4.8 kB) 1025: #12 15.58 INFO: pip is looking at multiple versions of pytest-asyncio to determine which version is compatible with other requirements. This could take a while. 1026: #12 15.87 ERROR: Cannot install pr-agent and pr-agent==0.2.4 because these package versions have conflicting dependencies. ... 1028: #12 15.87 The conflict is caused by: 1029: #12 15.87 pr-agent 0.2.4 depends on pytest==7.4.0 1030: #12 15.87 pytest-asyncio 0.24.0 depends on pytest<9 and >=8.2 1031: #12 15.87 1032: #12 15.87 To fix this you could try to: 1033: #12 15.87 1. loosen the range of package versions you've specified 1034: #12 15.87 2. remove package versions to allow pip attempt to solve the dependency conflict 1035: #12 15.87 1036: #12 15.87 ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/topics/dependency-resolution/#dealing-with-dependency-conflicts 1037: #12 15.88 1038: #12 15.88 [notice] A new release of pip is available: 24.0 -> 24.3.1 1039: #12 15.88 [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip 1040: #12 ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1 1041: ------ 1042: > [base 6/6] RUN pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt: 1043: 15.87 pytest-asyncio 0.24.0 depends on pytest<9 and >=8.2 1044: 15.87 1045: 15.87 To fix this you could try to: 1046: 15.87 1. loosen the range of package versions you've specified 1047: 15.87 2. remove package versions to allow pip attempt to solve the dependency conflict 1048: 15.87 1049: 15.87 ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/topics/dependency-resolution/#dealing-with-dependency-conflicts ... 1054: Dockerfile:7 1055: -------------------- 1056: 5 \| ADD requirements.txt . 1057: 6 \| ADD docs docs 1058: 7 \| >>> RUN pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt 1059: 8 \| ENV PYTHONPATH=/app 1060: 9 \| 1061: -------------------- 1062: ERROR: failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1 1063: ##[error]buildx failed with: ERROR: failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c pip install . && rm pyproject.toml requirements.txt" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

Failed stage
Failed test name
Failure summary
Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

hussam789 · 2024-12-02T12:16:08Z

/help how to do a custom label in PR Agent?

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2024-12-02T12:16:35Z

Question:

how to do a custom label in PR Agent?

Answer:

There are 3 ways to enable custom labels in Qodo Merge (PR-Agent):

CLI (local configuration file):
Edit the custom_labels.toml file with your custom labels and their descriptions.
Repo configuration file:
Add custom labels configuration to the local .pr_agent.toml file:

[config]
enable_custom_labels=true

[custom_labels."Custom Label Name"] 
description = "Description of when AI should suggest this label"

Repo's labels page (Pro feature):

Go to repo's labels page (GitHub/GitLab)
Add custom labels with description prefixed by "pr_agent:"
Format: Label name + "pr_agent: Description of when AI should suggest this label"

The custom labels will be used by both the dedicated /generate_labels tool and the describe tool.

Relevant Sources:

https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//tools/custom_labels#overview

https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//tools/custom_labels#how-to-enable-custom-labels

https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai//tools/describe#overview

coditamar · 2024-12-05T22:27:45Z

/ask does it make sense that the test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key() doesn't have asserts?

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2024-12-05T22:27:56Z

Ask❓

does it make sense that the test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key() doesn't have asserts?

Answer:

Yes, it makes sense that the test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key() function doesn't have traditional asserts. Instead, it uses mock_git_provider.publish_comment.assert_called_once_with(...) to verify that the expected behavior occurs when there is no OpenAI API key. This is a common pattern in unit tests that involve mocking, where the test checks that certain methods are called with expected arguments, rather than asserting on return values or state changes. This approach is appropriate for testing interactions with mocked objects.

mrT23 · 2024-12-06T13:20:14Z

/improve

mrT23 · 2024-12-10T05:59:47Z

/describe
--pr_description.generate_ai_title=true

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2024-12-10T05:59:59Z

PR Description updated to latest commit (276a869)

Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

mrT23 · 2024-12-10T06:06:08Z

/review

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2024-12-10T06:06:25Z

Persistent review updated to latest commit 276a869

mrT23 · 2024-12-10T06:07:37Z

/review
auto_approve

mrT23 · 2024-12-10T09:21:47Z

PR Description updated to latest commit (276a869)

Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

mrT23 · 2024-12-10T14:38:53Z

Preparing PR description...

mrT23 · 2024-12-10T14:40:18Z

Preparing PR description...

mrT23 · 2024-12-10T14:48:26Z

Preparing PR description...

mrT23 · 2024-12-11T11:03:59Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

mrT23 · 2024-12-11T11:04:51Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

mrT23 · 2024-12-11T11:05:15Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

chungocchien · 2024-12-31T01:39:04Z

Preparing review...

chungocchien · 2024-12-31T01:39:38Z

Preparing review...

chungocchien · 2024-12-31T01:40:17Z

Preparing review...

chungocchien · 2024-12-31T01:41:37Z

Preparing review...

chungocchien · 2024-12-31T01:43:33Z

Preparing review...

chungocchien · 2024-12-31T01:58:07Z

Preparing review...

chungocchien · 2024-12-31T02:00:39Z

Preparing review...

mrT23 · 2025-01-02T10:46:23Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 276a869

Category Suggestion Score

Possible issue

Add test cases to ensure extract_header handles various header formats and cases

Ensure that extract_header function correctly handles headers with different cases
and formats.

tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [17-25]

-+def test_extract_header():
-+    # Test with valid header
-+    snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content==="
-+    assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test"
-+    
-+    # Test with no header
-+    snippet = "Some content\n===Snippet content==="
-+    assert extract_header(snippet) == ""
-+    
-+    # Test with multiple headers (should take first header in reversed list)
-+    snippet = "Header 1: First\nHeader 2: Last\n===Snippet content==="
-+    assert extract_header(snippet) == "#first"
+def test_extract_header():
+    # Test with valid header
+    snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content==="
+    assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test"
+    
+    # Test with no header
+    snippet = "Some content\n===Snippet content==="
+    assert extract_header(snippet) == ""
+    
+    # Test with multiple headers (should take first header in reversed list)
+    snippet = "Header 1: First\nHeader 2: Last\n===Snippet content==="
+    assert extract_header(snippet) == "#first"
+    
+    # Additional test cases for different formats
+    snippet = "HEADER 3: MixedCase\n===Snippet content==="
+    assert extract_header(snippet) == "#mixedcase"
+    
+    snippet = "header 4: lowercase\n===Snippet content==="
+    assert extract_header(snippet) == "#lowercase"

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

Why: The suggestion adds additional test cases to verify that the extract_header function can handle headers in different formats and cases, which is a good practice for ensuring robustness. However, it does not address the existing functionality mentioned in the comment.

3

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit 276a869

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Enhance error handling for missing OpenAI API key scenarios Add error handling in `test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key` to manage cases where the OpenAI API key is not provided, preventing runtime errors. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [62] -await help_msg.run() +try: + await help_msg.run() +except KeyError: + # Handle missing OpenAI key Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion is valuable as it addresses potential runtime errors due to missing configuration, enhancing the robustness and reliability of the test.	7
General	Ensure complete initialization validation of `PRHelpMessage` properties Modify the `test_pr_help_message_init` to check for proper initialization of all properties of `PRHelpMessage`, including edge cases for `args`. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [41] assert help_msg.question_str == "test question" +assert help_msg.args == ["test", "question"] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 2 Why: The suggestion is valid in encouraging more thorough testing, but the improved code does not reflect a significant change or improvement, as it only adds an assertion that is not directly related to the initialization process.	2

Suggestions up to commit 276a869

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Add test cases for edge cases and invalid inputs to ensure robust error handling Add error handling for invalid input in extract_header() test cases. The current test assumes the input will always be well-formed with valid string content. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [8-11] def test_extract_header(): # Test with valid header snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content===" assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test" + + # Test with invalid input + assert extract_header("") == "" + assert extract_header(None) == "" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding test cases for edge cases like empty strings and None values is important for ensuring the extract_header() function handles invalid inputs gracefully and prevents potential runtime errors.	7
General	Ensure proper cleanup of mock objects after test execution to prevent test interference Add cleanup or teardown steps after the test to reset the mock's state and ensure test isolation. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [50-53] @pytest.mark.asyncio @patch("pr_agent.tools.pr_help_message.get_git_provider_with_context") @patch("pr_agent.tools.pr_help_message.get_settings") async def test_pr_help_message_run_no_openai_key(mock_get_settings, mock_get_provider, mock_git_provider): + try: + # Test content... + finally: + mock_get_settings.reset_mock() + mock_get_provider.reset_mock() + mock_git_provider.reset_mock() Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: While cleaning up mocks is good practice, pytest automatically handles mock cleanup between tests, so this suggestion provides limited value and is not strictly necessary.	3

Suggestions up to commit 276a869

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Add test coverage for malformed input scenarios to ensure robust header extraction Add error handling for malformed headers to prevent potential issues with header extraction. The current implementation assumes headers are well-formed. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [8-11] def test_extract_header(): # Test with valid header snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content===" assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test" + + # Test with malformed header + snippet = "Header 1 Test\n===Snippet content===" + assert extract_header(snippet) == "" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding test cases for malformed headers is important for ensuring the robustness of the header extraction function, as it helps prevent potential runtime errors and unexpected behavior in production.	7
General	Include edge case testing for empty input to prevent potential runtime errors Add test case for empty string input in extract_header function to ensure proper handling of edge cases. tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [8-11] def test_extract_header(): # Test with valid header snippet = "Header 1: Test\n===Snippet content===" assert extract_header(snippet) == "#test" + + # Test with empty string + assert extract_header("") == "" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Testing empty string input is a fundamental edge case that should be covered to ensure the function handles all possible inputs correctly, though slightly less critical than malformed header testing.	6

Suggestions up to commit 2f746cc

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Strengthen test assertions to ensure proper handling of missing OpenAI API key scenario Add assertions to verify that the OpenAI key is None and that no other methods were called on the git provider besides publish_comment tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [61-66] # Test run with no OpenAI key await help_msg.run() +assert mock_get_settings.return_value.get.call_args_list[1][0][0] == "openai.api_key" mock_git_provider.publish_comment.assert_called_once_with( "The `Help` tool chat feature requires an OpenAI API key for calculating embeddings" ) +assert len(mock_git_provider.method_calls) == 1 Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion significantly improves test coverage by adding crucial assertions to verify the OpenAI key check and ensuring no unexpected git provider methods were called, making the test more robust and comprehensive.	8
General	Add edge case testing for question string initialization Add test cases for invalid/empty question strings to verify error handling tests/unittest/test_pr_help_message.py [38-42] # Test initialization with question help_msg = PRHelpMessage("test_url", args=["test", "question"], ai_handler=mock_ai_handler) assert help_msg.question_str == "test question" assert help_msg.git_provider == mock_git_provider +# Test with empty question +help_msg_empty = PRHelpMessage("test_url", args=[""], ai_handler=mock_ai_handler) +assert help_msg_empty.question_str == "" + +# Test with None question +help_msg_none = PRHelpMessage("test_url", args=None, ai_handler=mock_ai_handler) +assert help_msg_none.question_str == "" + Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion enhances test coverage by adding important edge cases for empty and None question strings, which are common scenarios that should be properly handled by the PRHelpMessage class.	7

mrT23 · 2025-01-12T12:06:06Z

/update_changelog

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2025-01-12T12:06:18Z

Changelog updates: 🔄

2025-01-12 *

Enhanced

Added unit tests for PR help message functionality
Enhanced PR help message initialization and handling
Added support for asynchronous testing

to commit the new content to the CHANGELOG.md file, please type:
'/update_changelog --pr_update_changelog.push_changelog_changes=true'

hussam789 · 2025-01-15T12:28:17Z

/describe
--pr_description.publish_labels=false
--pr_description.generate_ai_title=true

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source · 2025-01-15T12:28:30Z

PR Description updated to latest commit (276a869)

Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

mrT23 added 2 commits December 1, 2024 16:43

test: add unit tests for PR help message functionality

19ab51f

s

2f746cc

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot added the Review effort [1-5]: 1 label Dec 1, 2024

s

276a869

mrT23 changed the title ~~Tr/auto tests~~ auto tests Dec 10, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot changed the title ~~auto tests~~ Add unit tests and enhance PR help message functionality Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 removed the Review effort [1-5]: 1 label Dec 10, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot added the Review effort [1-5]: 2 label Dec 10, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot approved these changes Dec 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

Codium-ai deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot Dec 10, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Add unit tests and enhance PR help message functionality #1378

Add unit tests and enhance PR help message functionality #1378

mrT23 commented Dec 1, 2024 •

edited by qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot

Loading

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Configuration options

hussam789 commented Dec 2, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 2, 2024

coditamar commented Dec 5, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 5, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 6, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

mrT23 commented Jan 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

mrT23 commented Jan 12, 2025

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Jan 12, 2025

hussam789 commented Jan 15, 2025

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Add unit tests and enhance PR help message functionality #1378

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Add unit tests and enhance PR help message functionality #1378

Conversation

mrT23 commented Dec 1, 2024 • edited by qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot Loading

PR Type

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 1, 2024 • edited Loading

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit 276a869)

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 1, 2024 • edited Loading

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 2f746cc)

Configuration options

hussam789 commented Dec 2, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Question:

Answer:

Relevant Sources:

coditamar commented Dec 5, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Ask❓

Answer:

mrT23 commented Dec 6, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 10, 2024

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 • edited Loading

PR Code Suggestions ✨

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 • edited Loading

PR Code Suggestions ✨

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 • edited Loading

PR Code Suggestions ✨

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

chungocchien commented Dec 31, 2024

mrT23 commented Jan 2, 2025 • edited Loading

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Previous suggestions

mrT23 commented Jan 12, 2025

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Jan 12, 2025

2025-01-12 *

Enhanced

hussam789 commented Jan 15, 2025

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Jan 15, 2025

mrT23 commented Dec 1, 2024 •

edited by qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot

Loading

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

(Review updated until commit `276a869`)

qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source bot commented Dec 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

(Checks updated until commit `2f746cc`)

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mrT23 commented Dec 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mrT23 commented Jan 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading