-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
fix meat (caloric) density #81908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix meat (caloric) density #81908
Conversation
uncooked meat has excess water weight and bulk. cooked meat should have much more calories per gram, but also fewer grams in a 250ml portion. cracklins definitely don't sink in water.
|
I would prefer weight be untouched, as a lot of recipes are made based on the old weight, and instead would just reduce the calorie amount |
Do you mean reduce the calories in raw meat, rather than make raw meat larger? Then calories would magically appear out of nothing when you cook it into cooked meat. |
|
Calories would not appear, in most cases, because the game, in most cases again, inherit the amount of calories of a final product from it's components, if item is crafted. There is also a test that ensures that default amount of calories matches the amount of calories that can be obtained via the recipe But yeah it's probably a choice do you want to fight with recipes using incorrect amount of meat, or fight items not having a correct amount of calories |
scraps are tiny so use proportional for them instead.
it was never explicitly set before.
no more 402 calorie portions.
the 'meat' item is unchanged in mass and will be hard to change.
cooked meat has more calories now so hunger time is longer.
for a lower density item with more implied surface area.
|
Simplified to just fixing the number of calories in a portion of meat, can this PR be backported to 0.I? Is there a way to request it from the migo-chan bot? |
|
Is there a reason to backport it? we limit it only to bugfixes, and meat calories fit it only very nominally in my eyes |
Is that actually true? #81649 doesn't say bugfixes only, it doesn't even give absolute rules at all, it's very flexible-sounding guidance.
And the current test failure on this PR was fixed in #81926 |
|
Need to rebase |
Summary
Balance "More realistic meat calories"
Purpose of change
Uncooked
meatrealistically should have excess water weight and bulk removed in the cooking process.Cooked meat should have much more calories per gram, but also its density is physically impossible right now #54811
And realistically speaking, cracklins shouldn't be almost 2x denser than water.
Describe the solution
Increase the volume of all
cracklins, make them 4x less space efficient but with portions still divisible into 500 ml containers #81781Increase the calories in cooked meat and raw meat and everything that inherits from them.
Fix the density ofmeat_cookedand the numerous items thatcopy-frominherit from it.Increase theweight andvolume of raw meat. Update all items that inherit from rawmeataccordingly.Makemeat_cookedinherit frommeatand use"relative"and"proportional"fields.Describe alternatives you've considered
Increasing the weight of raw
meat, but that involves recipe consistency checks again. #61746 (comment)Decreasing the volume of cooked meat, but that's impossible because it has to exactly fit into sealed cans. #81781
Testing
Additional context
Raw
meatused to also have the illogical density and weight of 296 grams that cooked meat currently still does, until raw meat was fixed in #61746