3D LWFA PICMI Test: Add Electron Beam #2723
Merged
+57
−16
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
EZoni
commented
Jan 5, 2022
Examples/Physics_applications/laser_acceleration/PICMI_inputs_1d.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
EZoni
changed the title
EZoni
force-pushed
the
lwfa_picmi_followup
branch
from
367e85f to
dee0820
Compare
EZoni
changed the title
EZoni
force-pushed
the
lwfa_picmi_followup
branch
from
dee0820 to
b3baf04
Compare
EZoni
force-pushed
the
lwfa_picmi_followup
branch
from
b3baf04 to
25725ec
Compare
EZoni
changed the title
EZoni
force-pushed
the
lwfa_picmi_followup
branch
from
f934439 to
539fb76
Compare
EZoni
changed the title
EZoni
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add electron beam to 3D LWFA PICMI tests, following up on #2700. The electron beam is already included in the 2D and RZ examples.
The 1D test was not generating non-zero particle benchmarks, and, since I have not yet understood why, I suggest that we handle the 1D test separately. See #2819 for reference.