Skip to content

Conversation

@Evian-Zhang
Copy link
Contributor

AFLplusplus/LibAFL#3299 has changed the argument to directly take operand size as argument, and since we have tracked to libafl main branch again, the shape here should be fixed.

@wtdcode
Copy link
Member

wtdcode commented Jun 25, 2025

Can we have this mapping in libafl? Like a few helpers to get right values.

@Evian-Zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

The mapping is trivial, just bit width to bytes. Why should this live in libafl?

@wtdcode
Copy link
Member

wtdcode commented Jun 27, 2025

Why should this live in libafl?

To avoid further breaking changes to downstream, i.e., libafl should make migration seamless.

@wtdcode wtdcode merged commit de2f8d9 into AFLplusplus:v3 Jun 27, 2025
12 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants