Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DocDB] Improve bulk load performance for colocated table #25456

Open
1 task done
huapengy opened this issue Dec 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

[DocDB] Improve bulk load performance for colocated table #25456

huapengy opened this issue Dec 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue status/awaiting-triage Issue awaiting triage

Comments

@huapengy
Copy link
Contributor

huapengy commented Dec 30, 2024

Jira Link: DB-14701

Description

The colocated table is experiencing worse bulk load performance compared to the non-colocated table in the distributed cluster, particularly when the table has multiple indexes. Further investigation is needed to identify ways to improve the bulk load performance for the colocated table.

Issue Type

kind/enhancement

Warning: Please confirm that this issue does not contain any sensitive information

  • I confirm this issue does not contain any sensitive information.
@huapengy huapengy added area/docdb YugabyteDB core features status/awaiting-triage Issue awaiting triage labels Dec 30, 2024
@huapengy huapengy self-assigned this Dec 30, 2024
@yugabyte-ci yugabyte-ci added kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue labels Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/enhancement This is an enhancement of an existing feature priority/medium Medium priority issue status/awaiting-triage Issue awaiting triage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants