-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The RAF-DB that aligned by MTCNN. #9
Comments
hi, very much appreciated |
Thank you for your suggestion. I have made the following updates on the Readme: specified the alignment codes, and included a copy of our preprocessed version of the RAF-DB. Please refer to the updated (Readme file)[https://github.com/youqingxiaozhua/APViT/blob/main/README.md] for more infromation. |
thanks for the update. thanks again for your time |
For cases where the face is not detected, I use images from the dataset’s original aligned folder. For cases where there are multiple faces, I am not sure whether I used the original image or just choose the most confident one. Sorry about that, but I I cannot remember that. However, currently, I think the prior strategy looks more reasonable. |
thanks. this is helpful. thanks again |
hi, i used the code as it is. i run it with few samples from raf-db.
thanks again for the help test_0001: test_0002: yours: ours [almost similar]: test_0003: yours [this is different than the original aligned or cropped in raf-db. not sure how did you pick this one]: ours [in this order. problem. how did you pick the second face in your case?]: test_0006: yours: |
Excuse me, could you provide the RAF-DB that you train and test? Because I can't achieve the performance of 91.98% on the official aligned test set of RAF-DB with the weight APViT_RAF-3eeecf7d.pth. Then I try to re-align the official aligned test set by MTCNN, but it doesn't work either. I only get the top-1 accuracy: 81.42%.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: