Skip to content

Conversation

@mesejo
Copy link
Collaborator

@mesejo mesejo commented Oct 20, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 55.28455% with 55 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ython/xorq/vendor/ibis/backends/duckdb/__init__.py 49.53% 54 Missing ⚠️
python/xorq/flight/action.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
python/xorq/common/tests/test_cache.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
python/xorq/common/utils/defer_utils.py 96.42% <ø> (ø)
python/xorq/common/utils/node_utils.py 86.13% <100.00%> (+0.42%) ⬆️
...hon/xorq/common/utils/tests/test_dask_normalize.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
python/xorq/expr/relations.py 85.04% <100.00%> (ø)
python/xorq/flight/tests/test_actions.py 97.22% <100.00%> (ø)
python/xorq/tests/test_cli.py 97.21% <100.00%> (ø)
...on/xorq/vendor/ibis/backends/sql/compilers/base.py 80.79% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
python/xorq/flight/action.py 76.06% <0.00%> (ø)
...ython/xorq/vendor/ibis/backends/duckdb/__init__.py 58.38% <49.53%> (-1.53%) ⬇️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 20, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1351 will not alter performance

Comparing chore/update_duckdb_backend_code_ibis (cc1f6d6) with main (ad728d0)

Summary

✅ 4 untouched

@mesejo mesejo force-pushed the chore/update_duckdb_backend_code_ibis branch from 9dc5d5c to 320acdb Compare November 6, 2025 08:45
@mesejo mesejo force-pushed the chore/update_duckdb_backend_code_ibis branch from 320acdb to cc1f6d6 Compare November 10, 2025 18:41
@mesejo mesejo marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants