You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks a million times for rove! I use it almost daily, and it's really allowed me to experiment and develop my music over the years :). Totally dig it.
Is there some sort of roadmap to synchronize rove and other looping devices? If not, I think it would be a rad feature to consider.
Unfortunately, this feature might creep out to some other nice-to-haves with rove, like a plugin-type system where we could configure different external machines (BOSS RC-50, etc), and their (ostensibly) unique logic to handle synchronization (MIDI clock, etc).
In summation, the purpose of this "issue" is to mainly get some feedback on such a feature, and your thoughts on what would be required to augment rove in order to provide this functionality in a clean and unobtrusive manner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
so, here's the deal. this is something i've wanted for a long time, but i definitely coded myself into a corner with rove, and it's tough to do with the code in the current state it's in.
the way rove currently works is that there's a global clock, which is less a global clock and more just a countdown until the next quantization tick. there's no concept of beats, bars, etc, it's just the Tick. we'll capitalize it, make it a proper noun here. for everybody following along at home, the meat and potatoes are in src/jack.c, line 93 in process().
when something happens to a file (generally, when you press a button on the monome), the monome code will register a callback function to happen on the next Tick. this is how seeking works. patterns are also slaves of the Tick. in fact, pattern lengths are calculated in terms of Ticks.
anyway. my vision eventually was to split out the timekeeping behavior into the individual groups, so that they would all have their own playheads/clocks, and this could also enable different quantization levels (1/16ths for the drums, 1/8ths for the chords, say). then, the groups' playheads would be slaved to a "master", which would further either slave or be slaved to JACK transport or MIDI clock or whatever.
unfortunately, that's a lot of work. and, to be honest, there are other design issues in rove that have put me off from developing it actively. add to the fact that i don't really use it much anymore, and, well...nothing is ever finished.
the good news is that i've taken some lessons from rove and am rewriting it into a much beefier and capable piece of software. the bad news is that it will be a commercial offering.
Yo!
Thanks a million times for rove! I use it almost daily, and it's really allowed me to experiment and develop my music over the years :). Totally dig it.
Is there some sort of roadmap to synchronize rove and other looping devices? If not, I think it would be a rad feature to consider.
Unfortunately, this feature might creep out to some other nice-to-haves with rove, like a plugin-type system where we could configure different external machines (BOSS RC-50, etc), and their (ostensibly) unique logic to handle synchronization (MIDI clock, etc).
In summation, the purpose of this "issue" is to mainly get some feedback on such a feature, and your thoughts on what would be required to augment rove in order to provide this functionality in a clean and unobtrusive manner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: