Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that codec fields are "codec string" #872

Open
aphillips opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Clarify that codec fields are "codec string" #872

aphillips opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
CR Blocking Needs to resolved for Candidate Recommendation editorial changes to wording, grammar, etc that don't modify the intended behavior i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.

Comments

@aphillips
Copy link

Location: (various such as)
https://www.w3.org/TR/webcodecs/#dom-audioencoderconfig-codec

codec, of type DOMString
Contains a codec string describing the codec.

There are a variety of DOMString fields named codec described as "a codec string describing the codec" or . In some cases, the term "codec string" is not linked to the definition, making it unclear from the spec if these are wholly program internal or are instead prose descriptions that might need language/direction metadata. We'd suggest checking the document to ensure that all instances of the term are linked.

@aphillips aphillips added editorial changes to wording, grammar, etc that don't modify the intended behavior i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. labels Jan 23, 2025
@Djuffin Djuffin added the CR Blocking Needs to resolved for Candidate Recommendation label Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CR Blocking Needs to resolved for Candidate Recommendation editorial changes to wording, grammar, etc that don't modify the intended behavior i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants