Skip to content

Improve/extend G215 path-based/multipoint #4892

@patrickhlauke

Description

@patrickhlauke

From @detlevhfischer / #793 (comment)

The test in G215 needs work, I think. Currently it is limited to testing content sliders ("For content sliders that respond to path-based gestures...") but there can be other content relying on complex gestures (path-based or multipoint) which are not covered. So it should say instead something like:

For any functionality that is operated by a multipoint or path-based gesture and does not fall under the essential exception:

Also, one could consider using the wider set of examples (possibly modified) I had in my technique draft, such as controls for panning a map where zooming out and zooming in to another location by tapping / clicking on another place in the map is not supported. Another case could be a different swipe gesture: swipe left to delete (or reveal a delete button), swipe right to archive (or reveal an archive button). The latter could exemplify a way of meeting the SC by tapping on the item to go to an item detail view where you then activate the delete and archive buttons (arguably not quite equivalent in terms of effort, but I guess we would call that a PASS?) So I guess instead of saying "check that single pointer operable controls exist over or adjacent to the content slider" it should something more general, perhaps like

"Check that for the functionality implemented by the gesture there exists an alternative that can be operated by a simple pointer input (or a sequence of simple pointer inputs)."

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions