Tweak to the introductory text to the REC track

Closes #406

Author: frivoal

index.bs

@@ -2566,7 +2566,7 @@ The W3C Recommendation Track</h3>
 	once review suggests the Working Group has met their requirements satisfactorily for a new standard,
 	there is a [=Candidate Recommendation=] phase.
 	This allows the entire W3C membership to provide feedback
-	on whether the specification is appropriate as a [=W3C Recommendation=],
+	on the specification,
 	while the [=Working Group=] formally collects <a href="implementation-experience">implementation experience</a>
 	to demonstrate that the specification works in practice.
 	The next phase is a [=Proposed Recommendation=],
@@ -4837,6 +4837,10 @@ Final adjustements</h4>
 			Define the published proposed changes to be treated as Working Drafts
 			for the purpose of the Patent Policy.
 
+		<li>
+			Remove statement from introductory text on the REC track
+			about the kind of feedback the AC is expected to provide during the CR phase.
+
 	</ul>
 
 	A <a href="https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fw3process%2Fsnapshots%2Fafter-everblue.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fw3process%2F">diff comparing the state before/after these changes</a> is available.

issues-20190301.txt

@@ -699,3 +699,10 @@ Summary:  Streamlining horizontal reviews
 From:     Lukasz Olejnik
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/347
 Closed:   Deferred
+----
+Issue 90.
+Summary:  Part of introductory text about REC track is confusing / inaccurate / ineffective
+From:     Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/406
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/406#issuecomment-642057764