-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Proposal] Keep original Type when calling supertype methods #59
Comments
A) is a good idea. I think we discussed and rejected B) quite some time ago. |
C) all subtypes have corresponding nodes for all inherited operations from all supertypes. Their state input and output pins are typed with the subtype. When navigating into an interface e.g. |
In the current implementation the type you call a function on gets reduced to the supertype the type output of the function should be the same as the input to be able to chain it nicely

As in this image the input of setValue is textureInput but the output is Abstract Input
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: