-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
[artifact-manager] (#898) Fix push of vROps policies #911
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
stanislav-skkolev-spec
wants to merge
13
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix/898-push-vrops-policies
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3286b72
initial preparations
24fca7a
added XmlUtilities
43035cc
prepared for testing on customer env
de6c36a
added check for missing policies dependencies
9000729
comparison improved
52e1cbe
Merge branch 'main' into fix/898-push-vrops-policies
ced0f15
fixed Linter suggestions
5007320
fixed Linter errors
16f05fa
added Readme.md
eac90fc
fixed linter errors
0fddd50
removed 4.15.0 folder
2310f21
added Javadocs + minor fixes
0b1a576
Merge branch 'main' into fix/898-push-vrops-policies
VenelinBakalov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What amount of policies do we expect here? I am wondering if it makes sense to convert this to a map and use the name or id for key so we can reduce the filtering operations in case we expect a big list.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From what I have saw they are not that many.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Map also would make sure no duplicate policy ids are present in the zip.