Describe the bug
This happened before. At the time it was a bug in ast-v8-to-istanbul. See AriPerkkio/ast-v8-to-istanbul#169
This time I believe it's the change related to the concurrency:
Revive global concurrency limit for test lifecycle [backport to v4] - by @sheremet-va and @hi-ogawa in #10992 (5146d)
I'm speculating of course, but that seems to be the only relevant change.
Now, again, the generated cobertura report xml file contains method names with the same name for the same covered file (for example (anonymous_0) multiple times).
This breaks the cobertura report plugin in Jenkins which expects that the method names are unique. I assume this is mnadated by the cobertura report spec.
Reproduction
I will provide one later, when I'm not on mobile.
System Info
Used Package Manager
npm
Validations
Describe the bug
This happened before. At the time it was a bug in
ast-v8-to-istanbul. See AriPerkkio/ast-v8-to-istanbul#169This time I believe it's the change related to the concurrency:
I'm speculating of course, but that seems to be the only relevant change.
Now, again, the generated cobertura report xml file contains method names with the same name for the same covered file (for example
(anonymous_0)multiple times).This breaks the cobertura report plugin in Jenkins which expects that the method names are unique. I assume this is mnadated by the cobertura report spec.
Reproduction
I will provide one later, when I'm not on mobile.
System Info
Used Package Manager
npm
Validations