-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correcting discretization for Eurus #8
Comments
At #7, @ShaunHadden said:
|
Sorry! |
I am currently going through the paper Gerhard sent us and comparing it to our discretization to see if I can spot the error that's causing the amplitudes to be unstable |
So yeah, I think that the change on the |
Okay, good. Why don't you work on that, and then think about a good way to make an atomic change vs. master (i.e., don't drag in all the other stuff from the timedomain branch yet). |
feel free to just 'cherrypick' the one change, I don't think anything else is required just yet |
@ShaunHadden I ran a script to import this issue from anemoi |
To summarize: In meeting with @ShaunHadden and Gerhard, we found some mistakes in Operto (2009) that resulted in amplitude errors when modelling TTI. This was resolved in 9c0d4b6. |
Outstanding issue: velocity dispersion exists in Eurus solutions when compared to the analytical Helmholtz equation in stretched coordinates. See Compare Solutions - Homogenous (Eurus) This makes quite a noticeable difference for gradient computation; cf. MiniZephyr and Eurus. |
Eurus problems were dealt with; see e.g., 161af4e |
Tuesday Nov 17, 2015 at 19:51 GMT
Originally opened as uwoseis/anemoi#8
Issue created to discuss Eurus testing & corrections.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: