Use much lower burnup fraction #2947
jonmaddock
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
In GitLab by @mkovari on May 18, 2015, 15:15 Commit 015c19c0 OUT.DAT now has: The number of vacuum pumps is now very large. This may indicate a serious problem with pumping away the gas. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
In GitLab by @mkovari on Jun 4, 2018, 10:39 A more detailed model of burn-up would be valuable. See, for example, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379618304927 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The vacuum pumping during flat-top and the burnup are both affected by
tauratio, the ratio of He and pellet particle confinement times. This should also be consistent with the helium enrichment in the divertor zone. Altogether it's a can of worms, but an important one.The vacuum pumping in STEP is being studied by Antulio Tarazona.
Related issues: #305, #1746.
In GitLab by @mkovari on May 15, 2015, 08:32
The DT fuelling rate is very small, because of the unrealistically high value of burn-up fraction. We should try to use a more sensible value, at least an order of magnitude smaller.
I have implemented this simple modification:
tauratio /1.0/ : ratio of He and pellet particle confinement timesThe default is 1, giving full backwards compatibility.
The burnup is reduced by the same ratio.
NOTE. If
tauratiois bigger than 1, this may increase the number of vacuum pumps required, which will affect the availability. If the vacuum pumping system size is governed by the requirements for helium ash removal, then there should be no effect.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions