You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed a small error in the comments of the string indexing example provided in the [src/data_types/test_strings.py]. The comment incorrectly refers to the sixth character of the string as the "Fifth character".
Current Code:
word = 'Python'
assert word[0] == 'P' # First character.
assert word[5] == 'n' # Fifth character.
Issue:
The comment for assert word[5] == 'n' incorrectly states "Fifth character" while it actually checks the sixth character of the string word.
Suggested Correction:
word = 'Python'
assert word[0] == 'P' # First character.
assert word[5] == 'n' # Sixth character.
Correction Explanation:
Python strings are zero-indexed, so the first character is at index 0, and the sixth character is at index 5. The proposed change corrects the comment to accurately reflect the character's position in the string.
I hope this helps improve the documentation/code for future readers. If it's okay, I can submit a pull request #83 with this minor fix.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
fancling
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I've noticed a small error in the comments of the string indexing example provided in the [src/data_types/test_strings.py]. The comment incorrectly refers to the sixth character of the string as the "Fifth character".
Current Code:
word = 'Python'
assert word[0] == 'P' # First character.
assert word[5] == 'n' # Fifth character.
Issue:
The comment for assert word[5] == 'n' incorrectly states "Fifth character" while it actually checks the sixth character of the string word.
Suggested Correction:
word = 'Python'
assert word[0] == 'P' # First character.
assert word[5] == 'n' # Sixth character.
Correction Explanation:
Python strings are zero-indexed, so the first character is at index 0, and the sixth character is at index 5. The proposed change corrects the comment to accurately reflect the character's position in the string.
I hope this helps improve the documentation/code for future readers. If it's okay, I can submit a pull request #83 with this minor fix.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
fancling
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: