Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thoughts on nvm? #115

Closed
wyze opened this issue Apr 21, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Thoughts on nvm? #115

wyze opened this issue Apr 21, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@wyze
Copy link
Member

wyze commented Apr 21, 2016

nvm is a nice tool used to setup and manage Node versions. It doesn't cause permission issues when installing as Homebrew might. It has same instructions for OSX/Linux.

Thoughts on making it the recommended way to install Node on OSX/Linux? If not recommended, what about mentioning it as an alternate?

@reconbot
Copy link
Member

I'd recommend it for anyone who might be using more than one version, but
I've always had people install 4x directly during workshops as it's more
strait forward.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Neil Kistner [email protected]
wrote:

nvm https://github.com/creationix/nvm/ is a nice tool used to setup and
manage Node versions. It doesn't cause permission issues when installing as
Homebrew might. It has same instructions for OSX/Linux.

Thoughts on making it the recommended way to install Node on OSX/Linux? If
not recommended, what about mentioning it as an alternate?


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#115

Francis Gulotta
Director of Web Connected Devices
Mobile: 917-805-3079

@LinusU
Copy link

LinusU commented Apr 21, 2016

There was another thread discussing this, on mobile now so can't link though...

I personally feel that it just complicates things for our end users, and as far as I know you'll still have the permissions problem with nvm as well? The easy fix for the permissions problem is to never use sudo in front of npm...

@wyze
Copy link
Member Author

wyze commented Apr 21, 2016

Oops, I should have searched first! Looks like #55 is still open for discussion. So I will close this in favor of that one.

@wyze wyze closed this as completed Apr 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants