Skip to content

Authorship Criteria #195

@certik

Description

@certik

Dear co-authors (@asmeurer, @smichr, @mattpap, @certik, @skirpichev, @mrocklin, @aktech, @scolobb, @moorepants, @leosartaj, @thilinarmtb, @flacjacket, @ellisonbg, @rpmuller, @Upabjojr, @hargup, @shivamvats, @fredrik-johansson, @fabianp, @mattcurry, @aterrel, @rouckas, @ashutoshsaboo, @isuruf, @sumith1896, @rc, @scopatz), here are the ICMJE authorship criteria that we follow:

  1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the
    acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
  2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual
    content; AND
  3. Final approval of the version to be published; AND
  4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that
    questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
    appropriately investigated and resolved.

I have verified that all of you satisfy 1. and 2. (and the info is easily accessible in authors.md for anyone to browse). The version to be published is 9fb21e8, can you all give a final approval of this version (thus satisfying 3.) and also agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved (thus satisfying 4.).

Just post a comment that you agree. If you do not agree to 3. or 4., let me know.

These people agreed to 3. and 4. below in a comment:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions