Repository navigation
Hidden message reply #3008
Replies: 10 comments
|
I like the private reply idea! I'm not sure about people paying to see it, but I definitely like private messages! |
you mean in a different way than just #56 ? |
|
#56 is something different. |
|
Yes, I understood, was just wondering in what way this here would be different from #56 without the paywall (which I am also not sure about). Basically: Isn't this #56 just with a paywall? So if we remove the paywall, then it's #56?
Can you share some examples? This sound like an oxymoron for me. If something is truly private, I don't want other people to see it even if they pay for it |
Same.
Yes, because a private reply inherits the context of the thread. In a way, it's more natural and fits within existing ergonomics. A DM is like it's own thing. A metaphor might help.
It'd be cool if we can design a DM/private reply system that is somehow a hybrid of these ideas rather than independent things, but I'm not sure. |
I see, so something related to #350 |
|
Somewhat, but still not the same. I updated my comment. These are 3 different problems and 3 different solutions. It'd be nice to solve them all with 1 solution but it might not be possible. |
|
Maybe I want to send a PR-13 meme in a reply. Maybe I want to send a reply with some text that is dedicated and related to previous comments, but want to be shown first only to the OP. If others really want to see it, must pay to SN pool. Is more like a game let's say. |
|
Added blocked label because we want private replies to be E2EE. |
|
Private replies / messages are something else. Think about also about this scenario - I want to hide in a "spoiler alert" blurred comment some information that can be visible:
Like a bounty but the way around :) Example - some stacker will ask something specific about how to do X thing. If more stackers paid the min fee, but in total was reaching the max fee, then the message is revealed to all readers. This feature could be used in so many ways and open a lot of SN "games" that could incentivize users for good answers. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
A reply feature that will hide the text for other readers
Will be nice and useful to have a way to reply to somebody, but only that user could see the text.
Other stackers MUST pay a fee to see it.
The fee could be defined by the OP when is replying.
This could be very useful when stackers are talking about some more private information but still want to share it with others.
Could have many use cases on SN.
Please consider it.
All reactions