Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
This sounds good from a high-level PoV: I will just add that the more I see of Perhaps it would be good to catalogue the current issues somewhere and then figure out prioritisation for getting them actioned? |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are various cases when obfuscation of IPs, hostnames or usernames is not pedantically applied on all instances due to insufficient tokenisation, word boundaries or sensitive words as pure substrings. The obfuscated output then can contain various sensitive leftovers.
My idea is to have a
--validateoption that will take sanitised sosreport directory and check if no key from obfuscation mapping is present there. Something like in bash:but call it natively in Python :) and take relevant keys from
ipv6_mapthat stores sensitive keys at differentjsonlevel(s).Does the feature sound good?
All reactions