-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate auroras TTFZ - use mt_metadata.TF instead #203
Comments
|
kkappler
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2023
Modify KernelDataset so that it keeps a copy of survey metadata This survey metadata is still not being filed correctly in the TF object however.
Apparent resistivity does not exist in mt_metadata. The aurora method should move to sandbox until we are integrated with MTPy |
kkappler
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 20, 2024
- see #203. It will be easier to initialize an mt_metadata TF to replace this class rather than create a new version of TF
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This is not trivial because many tests use the TTFZ for validation.
TTFZ is used for apparent_resistivity calculations which are cited in tests.
So we need
aurora/transfer_function.base.TransferFunction
so we would need to add the mt_metadata there as wellThis is a pretty tricky task. Probably best to start by making
TransferFunction
base use mt_metadata.TF first.There is a lot of duplication between auroras TransferFunction base and mt_metadata TF.
One way to do this would be to start by
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: