You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+10-12Lines changed: 10 additions & 12 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -13,12 +13,10 @@ and mapping to NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act requirements.
13
13
## What Is AI Accountability?
14
14
15
15
AI accountability means that individuals and organizations can be held responsible
16
-
for the outcomes of AI systems — that there are clear lines of ownership, transparent
16
+
for the outcomes of AI systems, that there are clear lines of ownership, transparent
17
17
decision processes, and mechanisms for redress when things go wrong.
18
18
19
-
The NIST AI RMF defines accountability as one of seven characteristics of trustworthy AI:
20
-
> *"AI actors should be accountable for the development, deployment, and impacts of AI
21
-
> systems, including supporting human oversight."*
19
+
The NIST AI RMF defines accountability as one of the characteristics of trustworthy AI.
22
20
23
21
---
24
22
@@ -30,7 +28,7 @@ The NIST AI RMF defines accountability as one of seven characteristics of trustw
30
28
|---|---|---|
31
29
|**Model Inventory**| No central registry of AI systems in production | Maintain a versioned, owner-assigned inventory of all deployed models |
32
30
|**Ownership Assignment**| Unclear who is responsible when an AI system fails | Assign a named technical owner and business owner to every AI system |
33
-
|**AI Policy Cascade**| Governance policies not reaching practitioners | Publish policy as code — embed governance rules in CI/CD pipelines |
31
+
|**AI Policy Cascade**| Governance policies not reaching practitioners | Publish policy as code and embed governance rules in CI/CD pipelines |
34
32
|**Governance Gate**| AI systems deployed without appropriate review | Require signed-off checklists at defined lifecycle milestones |
35
33
36
34
### Transparency Patterns
@@ -49,15 +47,15 @@ The NIST AI RMF defines accountability as one of seven characteristics of trustw
49
47
|**Human-in-the-Loop Gate**| High-stakes decisions made autonomously | Require human review before action for decisions above a risk threshold |
50
48
|**Override Mechanism**| Operators cannot override erroneous AI decisions | Implement a documented, audited override pathway with reason capture |
51
49
|**Escalation Ladder**| Edge cases fall through without review | Define a tiered escalation path for low-confidence or novel inputs |
52
-
|**Sunset Clause**| Models remain in production past their useful life | Set mandatory model review dates; require affirmative renewal to continue |
50
+
|**Sunset Clause**| Models remain in production past their useful life | Set mandatory model review dates and require affirmative renewal to continue |
53
51
54
52
### Redress Patterns
55
53
56
54
| Pattern | Problem | Solution |
57
55
|---|---|---|
58
56
|**Adverse Action Explanation**| Affected individuals cannot understand why they were denied | Generate plain-language explanations with specific contributing factors |
59
57
|**Appeal Pathway**| No mechanism for contesting AI decisions | Implement a formal appeal process with human review and documented outcomes |
60
-
|**Impact Audit**| Unknown whether AI system is causing disproportionate harm | Conduct regular disparate impact audits by protected characteristics |
58
+
|**Impact Audit**| Unknown whether an AI system is causing disproportionate harm | Conduct regular disparate impact audits by protected characteristics |
61
59
62
60
---
63
61
@@ -72,10 +70,10 @@ pattern to NIST AI RMF functions and subcategories.
0 commit comments