Individual requirements should allow pipenv/poetry for functions

[michael-c-hoffman]

When using package individually, the requirements are not pulled from a Pipfile/peotry file if present, only requirements.txt
(this is a completely different behaviour than when not using package individually as at the root of the project on can use Pipfile/poetry)

If there is a Pipfile/poetry file at the root when using package individually the root level requirements are only packaged not the root+function or just function requirements.

I would like to continue to use Pipfile at the root level as this contains development packages for pytest and other frameworks. I would then like to include a Pipfile in each function that needs to be package with that function's requirements. Currently if serverless-python-requirements detects a Pipfile at the root all other function requirements are ignored.

[antoinechamot]

same here with:
package:
individually: true

if i have a Pipfile in my module it is just ignored

[bsamuel-ui]

What would you expect the layout to look like? For instance:

serverless.yml
module1/
    pyproject.toml
    func1/
        __init__.py
module2/
    Pipfile
    func2/
        __init__.py

[michael-c-hoffman]

yes, that would be the expected layout

[gerbenoostra]

I also expected to have pyproject.toml & requirements.txt to behave similar: if there's a pyproject.toml in the module directory, it would be used as preprocessing step to create the requirements.txt in the module dir.

However, only a pyproject.toml in the root folder results in creating a requirements.txt (in the root folder)