Expand dask support #2578
Labels
Area - Out of core 💾
Working with on disk data
Area – Performance 🐌
Meta
A meta-request to be implemented in multiple steps
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
What kind of feature would you like to request?
Additional function parameters / changed functionality / changed defaults?
Please describe your wishes
Meta issue tracking scanpy functions without dask support
Related #921
First we should test things more generically:
array_type
fixture to use in all tests for features below@ivirshup came up with places where we should prioritize dask support:
normalize_total
log1p
,normalize_per_cell
,filter_cells
/*_genes
:log1p
,normalize_per_cell
,filter_cells
/filter_genes
#2814sc.pp.pca
: Dask PCA support #2563 Implement sparsecovariance_eigh
PCA using Dask #3263sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics
(feat):calculate_qc_metrics
withdask
#3307sc.pp.highly_variable_genes
:sc.tl.rank_genes_groups
: Handle Dask arrays in some utilities #2621sc.pp.subsample
/sc.pp.sample
: so simple it has always been supportedsc.get.aggregate
with dask #3659Later:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: