Works generator generates tests that fail miserably

[flyingzumwalt]

In a freshly generated Rails app where I ran the rails g curate -f generator, When I run

$ rails g curate:work Text

it adds a suite of 50+ tests. Most of those tests fail.

To get most of the generated tests to pass

I had to do the following:

In spec/spec_helper.rb, add

require 'curate/spec_support'

AND THEN
add these to Gemfile:

gem 'poltergeist' 
gem 'vcr'
gem 'webmock'

AND

1. delete spec/factories/people_factory.rb
2. copy spec/matchers from curate into host app spec/support/matchers

That leaves 4 tests still failing

  1) Text behaves like remotely_identified by doi with valid attributes mints!
     Failure/Error: Hydra::RemoteIdentifier.mint(remote_service_name, subject)
     RuntimeError:
       Make sure to set your Curate.configuration.application_root_url
     Shared Example Group: "remotely_identified" called from ./spec/repository_models/text_spec.rb:14
     # ./config/initializers/hydra-remote_identifier_config.rb:6:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'

  2) CurationConcern::TextsController behaves like is_a_curation_concern_controller #edit someone elses private work should show 401 Unauthorized
     Failure/Error: get :edit, id: a_work
     CanCan::AccessDenied:
       You are not authorized to access this page.
     Shared Example Group: "is_a_curation_concern_controller" called from ./spec/controllers/curation_concern/texts_controller_spec.rb:6
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/gems/cancan-1.6.10/lib/cancan/ability.rb:208:in `authorize!'
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/gems/cancan-1.6.10/lib/cancan/controller_additions.rb:338:in `authorize!'
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/bundler/gems/curate-d17e75b7e862/app/controllers/curation_concern/base_controller.rb:40:in `authorize_curation_concern!'

  3) CurationConcern::TextsController behaves like is_a_curation_concern_controller #edit someone elses public work should show me the page
     Failure/Error: get :edit, id: a_work
     CanCan::AccessDenied:
       You are not authorized to access this page.
     Shared Example Group: "is_a_curation_concern_controller" called from ./spec/controllers/curation_concern/texts_controller_spec.rb:6
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/gems/cancan-1.6.10/lib/cancan/ability.rb:208:in `authorize!'
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/gems/cancan-1.6.10/lib/cancan/controller_additions.rb:338:in `authorize!'
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/bundler/gems/curate-d17e75b7e862/app/controllers/curation_concern/base_controller.rb:40:in `authorize_curation_concern!'

  4) CurationConcern::TextsController behaves like is_a_curation_concern_controller #new my work should show me the page
     Failure/Error: expect(response.body).to have_tag('.promote-doi .control-group') do
     NoMethodError:
       undefined method `has_tag?' for #<String:0x007f863c423cf8>
     Shared Example Group: "is_a_curation_concern_controller" called from ./spec/controllers/curation_concern/texts_controller_spec.rb:6
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/gems/rspec-expectations-2.14.5/lib/rspec/matchers/built_in/has.rb:10:in `matches?'
     # /Users/matt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p545/gems/rspec-expectations-2.14.5/lib/rspec/expectations/handler.rb:24:in `handle_matcher'

Finished in 34.37 seconds
52 examples, 4 failures

[jeremyf]

Failing test 4) add "gem 'rspec-html-matchers'" in Gemfile

[flyingzumwalt]

That did fix the 4th failing test.

[jeremyf]

Failing test 1) add to your environment file https://github.com/ndlib/curate_vanilla/blob/master/config/environments/staging.rb#L45

[jeremyf]

For test 2 & 3) Try running LOCAL=TRUE rspec ./spec/controllers/curation_concern/texts_controller_spec.rb:6

The LOCAL means "Raise the exceptions instead of using the exception handler." There may be something buried in there.

[flyingzumwalt]

Same errors with LOCAL=TRUE rspec ./spec/controllers/curation_concern/texts_controller_spec.rb

[jeremyf]

@flyingzumwalt Actually, I believe it is working. However your application is treating exceptions as local. That was one thing I had setup for Curate's tests to assume that exceptions are not local.

So the proposed solution would be to handle either case.

[flyingzumwalt]

Ah. Ok. I'll do that in my app, but this ticket will be important to address in Curate so that future adopters won't run into it.

[jeremyf]

Absolutely. And shouldn't be closed.

I believe your two steps are appropriate and should have the test case: "And the generated model tests work"

[jeremyf]

As an interesting aside - curate is assuming the use of rspec. Even in the spec_support.

[scherztc]

Would it be useful to have something similar to sufia_models with curation_concerns (works)?