You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Auto merge of #44060 - taleks:issue-43205, r=arielb1
Fixes issue #43205: ICE in Rvalue::Len evaluation.
- fixes evaluation of array length for zero-sized type referenced by rvalue operand.
- adds test to verify fix.
*Cause of the issue*.
Zero-sized aggregates are handled as operands, not lvalues. Therefore while visiting `Assign` statement by `LocalAnalyser`, `mark_as_lvalue()` is not called for related `Local`. This behaviour is controlled by `rvalue_creates_operand()` method.
As result it causes error later, when rvalue operand is evaluated in `trans_rvalue_operand()` while handling `Rvalue::Len` case. Array length evaluation invokes `trans_lvalue()` which expects referenced `Local` to be value, not operand.
*How it is fixed*.
In certain cases result of `Rvalue::Len` can be evaluated without calling
`trans_lvalue()`. Method `evaluate_array_len()` is introduced to handle length
evaluation for zero-sized types referenced by Locals.
*Some concerns*.
- `trans_lvalue()` has two other entry points in `rvalue.rs`: it is invoked while handling `Rvalue::Ref` and `Rvalue::Discriminant`. There is a chance those may produce the same issue, but I've failed to write a specific test that leads to this.
- `evaluate_array_len()` performs the same check (matches lvalue and `Local`), which is performed again in `trans_lvalue()`. Without changing `trans_lvalue()` signature to make it aware that caller deals with rvalue, it seems there is no cheap solution to avoid this check.
0 commit comments