You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current state of rpmspec-rs is "good enough" as in it can be used in production to read preambles. With that in mind, we probably might want to start merging code between rpmspec-rs and rpm-rs.
Personally I think it makes more sense for rpmspec-rs to use the types defined in rpm-rs as obviously they have a larger userbase and less cargo dependencies. In that case, the following entries need to be merged:
%changelog
ChangelogEntry (requires parsing implementation, current one is broken and unused)
The File* APIs probably need some adjustment, since as it stands they are barely usable IMO. But hooking it up to specfile parsing is probably a great way to sort out the issues and figure out what needs to be done about them.
The current state of
rpmspec-rs
is "good enough" as in it can be used in production to read preambles. With that in mind, we probably might want to start merging code betweenrpmspec-rs
andrpm-rs
.Personally I think it makes more sense for
rpmspec-rs
to use the types defined inrpm-rs
as obviously they have a larger userbase and less cargo dependencies. In that case, the following entries need to be merged:%changelog
%files
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: