You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a working ROS2 foxy ecosystem running Connext and came to the point where I need Connext key fields support. I'm looking for the simplest way to modify ROS2 or rmw_connextdds and allow the underlaying Connext RMW to have some of the fields defined as keys.
There is no current plan to work on this. This is actually a pretty complicated feature request, so if you were interested in pursuing it please start by opening a design document REP on https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep .
I'm not referring to ROS support for key fields, but rather to somehow add the is_key bit in Connext RMW typesupport. Which issues would rise in ROS if the RMW will internally handle keyed topics?
Hello,
I have a working ROS2 foxy ecosystem running Connext and came to the point where I need Connext key fields support. I'm looking for the simplest way to modify ROS2 or rmw_connextdds and allow the underlaying Connext RMW to have some of the fields defined as keys.
Most of the related rmw implementation seem to be in rmw_connext_dynamic_cpp/src/utility_templates.hpp which in conjunction with DDS_StructMember.is_key seems technically possible but I don't have the necessary architectural knowledge to workaround.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: