Commit "spi: rockchip: set higher io driver when sclk higher than 24MHz" causes kernel panic #79
Comments
|
FYI: #78 |
Kwiboo
pushed a commit
to Kwiboo/linux-rockchip
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2019
[ Upstream commit ac92985 ] When setting /sys/fs/f2fs/<DEV>/iostat_enable with non-bool value, UBSAN reports the following warning. [ 7562.295484] ================================================================================ [ 7562.296531] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2776:10 [ 7562.297651] load of value 64 is not a valid value for type '_Bool' [ 7562.298642] CPU: 1 PID: 7487 Comm: dd Not tainted 4.20.0-rc4+ rockchip-linux#79 [ 7562.298653] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 7562.298662] Call Trace: [ 7562.298760] dump_stack+0x46/0x5b [ 7562.298811] ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40 [ 7562.298830] __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x72/0x90 [ 7562.298863] f2fs_file_write_iter+0x29f/0x3f0 [ 7562.298905] __vfs_write+0x115/0x160 [ 7562.298922] vfs_write+0xa7/0x190 [ 7562.298934] ksys_write+0x50/0xc0 [ 7562.298973] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0xe0 [ 7562.298992] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 7562.299001] RIP: 0033:0x7fa45ec19c00 [ 7562.299004] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 88 92 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d dd eb 2c 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 ce 8f 01 00 48 89 04 24 [ 7562.299044] RSP: 002b:00007ffca52b49e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 7562.299052] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fa45ec19c00 [ 7562.299059] RDX: 0000000000000400 RSI: 000000000093f000 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ 7562.299065] RBP: 000000000093f000 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 7562.299071] R10: 00007ffca52b47b0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000400 [ 7562.299077] R13: 000000000093f000 R14: 000000000093f400 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 7562.299091] ================================================================================ So, if iostat_enable is enabled, set its value as true. Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
friendlyarm
pushed a commit
to friendlyarm/kernel-rockchip
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2020
[ Upstream commit 59bee45 ] Stefan reported a strange kernel fault which turned out to be due to a missing KUAP disable in flush_coherent_icache() called from flush_icache_range(). The fault looks like: Kernel attempted to access user page (7fffc30d9c00) - exploit attempt? (uid: 1009) BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x7fffc30d9c00 Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000007232c Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV CPU: 35 PID: 5886 Comm: sigtramp Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-gcc-8.2.0-00003-gfc37a1632d40 rockchip-linux#79 NIP: c00000000007232c LR: c00000000003b7fc CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c000001e11093940 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (5.6.0-rc2-gcc-8.2.0-00003-gfc37a1632d40) MSR: 900000000280b033 <SF,HV,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000884 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000000722fc DAR: 00007fffc30d9c00 DSISR: 08000000 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c00000000003b7fc c000001e11093bd0 c0000000023ac200 00007fffc30d9c00 GPR04: 00007fffc30d9c18 0000000000000000 c000001e11093bd4 0000000000000000 GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 c000001e1104ed80 GPR12: 0000000000000000 c000001fff6ab380 c0000000016be2d0 4000000000000000 GPR16: c000000000000000 bfffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 00007fffc30d9c00 00007fffc30d8f58 00007fffc30d9c18 00007fffc30d9c20 GPR24: 00007fffc30d9c18 0000000000000000 c000001e11093d90 c000001e1104ed80 GPR28: c000001e11093e90 0000000000000000 c0000000023d9d18 00007fffc30d9c00 NIP flush_icache_range+0x5c/0x80 LR handle_rt_signal64+0x95c/0xc2c Call Trace: 0xc000001e11093d90 (unreliable) handle_rt_signal64+0x93c/0xc2c do_notify_resume+0x310/0x430 ret_from_except_lite+0x70/0x74 Instruction dump: 409e002c 7c0802a6 3c62ff31 3863f6a0 f8010080 48195fed 60000000 48fe4c8d 60000000 e8010080 7c0803a6 7c0004ac <7c00ffac> 7c0004ac 4c00012c 38210070 This path through handle_rt_signal64() to setup_trampoline() and flush_icache_range() is only triggered by 64-bit processes that have unmapped their VDSO, which is rare. flush_icache_range() takes a range of addresses to flush. In flush_coherent_icache() we implement an optimisation for CPUs where we know we don't actually have to flush the whole range, we just need to do a single icbi. However we still execute the icbi on the user address of the start of the range we're flushing. On CPUs that also implement KUAP (Power9) that leads to the spurious fault above. We should be able to pass any address, including a kernel address, to the icbi on these CPUs, which would avoid any interaction with KUAP. But I don't want to make that change in a bug fix, just in case it surfaces some strange behaviour on some CPU. So for now just disable KUAP around the icbi. Note the icbi is treated as a load, so we allow read access, not write as you'd expect. Fixes: 890274c ("powerpc/64s: Implement KUAP for Radix MMU") Cc: [email protected] # v5.2+ Reported-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
scpcom
pushed a commit
to scpcom/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jun 23, 2022
[ Upstream commit 3fed9e5 ] If a compat process tries to execute an unknown system call above the __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END number, the kernel sends a SIGILL signal to the offending process. Information about the error is printed to dmesg in compat_arm_syscall() -> arm64_notify_die() -> arm64_force_sig_fault() -> arm64_show_signal(). arm64_show_signal() interprets a non-zero value for current->thread.fault_code as an exception syndrome and displays the message associated with the ESR_ELx.EC field (bits 31:26). current->thread.fault_code is set in compat_arm_syscall() -> arm64_notify_die() with the bad syscall number instead of a valid ESR_ELx value. This means that the ESR_ELx.EC field has the value that the user set for the syscall number and the kernel can end up printing bogus exception messages*. For example, for the syscall number 0x68000000, which evaluates to ESR_ELx.EC value of 0x1A (ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC) the kernel prints this error: [ 18.349161] syscall[300]: unhandled exception: ERET/ERETAA/ERETAB, ESR 0x68000000, Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000] [ 18.350639] CPU: 2 PID: 300 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1 rockchip-linux#79 [ 18.351249] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT) [..] which is misleading, as the bad compat syscall has nothing to do with pointer authentication. Stop arm64_show_signal() from printing exception syndrome information by having compat_arm_syscall() set the ESR_ELx value to 0, as it has no meaning for an invalid system call number. The example above now becomes: [ 19.935275] syscall[301]: unhandled exception: Oops - bad compat syscall(2) in syscall[10000+50000] [ 19.936124] CPU: 1 PID: 301 Comm: syscall Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-00005-g7e08006d4102 rockchip-linux#80 [ 19.936894] Hardware name: Pine64 RockPro64 v2.0 (DT) [..] which although shows less information because the syscall number, wrongfully advertised as the ESR value, is missing, it is better than showing plainly wrong information. The syscall number can be easily obtained with strace. *A 32-bit value above or equal to 0x8000_0000 is interpreted as a negative integer in compat_arm_syscal() and the condition scno < __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END evaluates to true; the syscall will exit to userspace in this case with the ENOSYS error code instead of arm64_notify_die() being called. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
scpcom
pushed a commit
to scpcom/linux
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2024
commit 667574e upstream. When tries to demote 1G hugetlb folios, a lockdep warning is observed: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty rockchip-linux#79 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- bash/710 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8f0a7850 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0x244/0x460 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&h->resize_lock); lock(&h->resize_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by bash/710: #0: ffff8f118439c3f0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x64/0xe0 #1: ffff8f11893b9e88 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf8/0x1d0 #2: ffff8f1183dc4428 (kn->active#98){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x100/0x1d0 #3: ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460 stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 710 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty rockchip-linux#79 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 __lock_acquire+0x10f2/0x1ca0 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x6d/0x400 demote_store+0x244/0x460 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12c/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x380/0x540 ksys_write+0x64/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa61db14887 RSP: 002b:00007ffc56c48358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fa61db14887 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055a030050220 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 000055a030050220 R08: 00007fa61dbd1460 R09: 000000007fffffff R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007fa61dc1b780 R14: 00007fa61dc17600 R15: 00007fa61dc16a00 </TASK> Lockdep considers this an AA deadlock because the different resize_lock mutexes reside in the same lockdep class, but this is a false positive. Place them in distinct classes to avoid these warnings. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 8531fc6 ("hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]> Acked-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This commit
causes this upon booting our RK3399-Q7 module:
Full dmesg: https://gist.github.com/jakob-tsd/b4618812b4d2b4ba78d5133bfab2844d
Stack trace: https://gist.github.com/jakob-tsd/bf3bed809df4558fde37de9864e18689
(with line numbers)
I have reverted the commit in our tree and it fixes the problem. So this is not urgent or anything but may be something to consider when you next touch the spi code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: