Skip to content

chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 6 #2

chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 6

chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4 to 6 #2

Workflow file for this run

name: Claude Code
on:
issue_comment:
types: [created]
pull_request_review_comment:
types: [created]
pull_request:
types: [opened, ready_for_review, reopened]
issues:
types: [opened, assigned]
pull_request_review:
types: [submitted]
jobs:
review:
if: |
github.event_name == 'pull_request' &&
!github.event.pull_request.draft
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
id-token: write
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v6
with:
fetch-depth: 1
- name: PR Review
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}
track_progress: true
prompt: |
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
Perform a comprehensive code review with the following focus areas:
1. **Code Quality**
- Clean code principles and best practices
- Proper error handling and edge cases
- Code readability and maintainability
2. **Security**
- Check for potential security vulnerabilities
- Validate input sanitization
- Review authentication/authorization logic
3. **Performance**
- Identify potential performance bottlenecks
- Review database queries for efficiency
- Check for memory leaks or resource issues
4. **Testing**
- Verify adequate test coverage
- Review test quality and edge cases
- Check for missing test scenarios
5. **Documentation**
- Ensure code is properly documented
- Verify README updates for new features
- Check API documentation accuracy
Provide detailed feedback using inline comments for specific issues.
After reviewing, post a top-level summary comment on the PR with the following format:
## Code Review Summary
| Category | Score | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| Code Quality | X/5 | Brief note |
| Security | X/5 | Brief note |
| Performance | X/5 | Brief note |
| Testing | X/5 | Brief note |
| Documentation | X/5 | Brief note |
| **Overall** | **X/5** | |
Scoring guide:
- 0: Critical issues, must fix before merge
- 1: Major issues that should be addressed
- 2: Several concerns worth discussing
- 3: Acceptable with minor suggestions
- 4: Good quality with nitpicks only
- 5: Excellent, no issues found
Follow the score table with a brief list of key findings (if any) and any praise for well-done aspects.
claude_args: |
--allowedTools "mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment,Bash(gh pr comment:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr view:*)"
claude:
if: |
(github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_review' && contains(github.event.review.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'issues' && (contains(github.event.issue.body, '@claude') || contains(github.event.issue.title, '@claude')))
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write
issues: write
id-token: write
actions: read
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v6
with:
fetch-depth: 1
- name: Run Claude Code
id: claude
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}