You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now that we've moved into the integration phase, I'm going through the old issues and PRs, and I will close many with a "moving on" tag, also pointing them to this discussion.
More specifically, I expect to tag most with one of two labels:
"moving on" means that Rhombus development has moved on to a point where this issue or PR no longer applies. It might be a design idea that is the road not taken, or it might be a process point that is superseded by the current state. There's no implied judgement that the idea was bad, only that it's not the way we've gone in balancing many different goals.
"yep moving on" is the same, but acknowledging that the goal or suggestion turned out to be the direction that we went.
In either case, there may be some point in a larger issue/PR that is still relevant, but it's difficult to tease all those out. It will be better to restart the point in a new issue or PR.
By tagging each closed issue or PR with this discussion, I think we'll end up with a list here of the issues and PRs that I close. (Didn't do that, so we'll have to rely on the tags.)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Now that we've moved into the integration phase, I'm going through the old issues and PRs, and I will close many with a "moving on" tag, also pointing them to this discussion.
More specifically, I expect to tag most with one of two labels:
"moving on" means that Rhombus development has moved on to a point where this issue or PR no longer applies. It might be a design idea that is the road not taken, or it might be a process point that is superseded by the current state. There's no implied judgement that the idea was bad, only that it's not the way we've gone in balancing many different goals.
"yep moving on" is the same, but acknowledging that the goal or suggestion turned out to be the direction that we went.
In either case, there may be some point in a larger issue/PR that is still relevant, but it's difficult to tease all those out. It will be better to restart the point in a new issue or PR.
By tagging each closed issue or PR with this discussion, I think we'll end up with a list here of the issues and PRs that I close.(Didn't do that, so we'll have to rely on the tags.)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions