-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
riscv64 test failure: format(fs_bytes(NA)) (actual
) not equal to "NA" (expected
)
#485
Comments
format(fs_bytes(NA)) (\
actual\) not equal to "NA" (\
expected\)
format(fs_bytes(NA)) (
actual) not equal to "NA" (
expected)
``
format(fs_bytes(NA)) (
actual) not equal to "NA" (
expected)
``actual
) not equal to "NA" (expected
)
I'm not sure this is an fs issue. AFAICT this would be to do with the NaN propagation R relies on. Further discussion here https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2023-February/082381.html |
Thank you @TimTaylor for the pointer. Can you suggest a patch that would automatically skip this test when run on a riscv system? |
mr-c
added a commit
to mr-c/fs
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2025
Fixes: r-lib#485 Inspired by r-lib#485 (comment)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-fs/testing/riscv64/56754062/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: