You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Expected behavior
I would expect the initiator to switch over to the failover acceptors when a socket connection failure happens. This is true when the IP address/hostname is not resolvable (the failover mechanism works as expected).
system information:
OS: Linux
Java 11
QFJ Version 2.3.0
Additional context
Is there a way to trigger the failover to the next acceptor programmatically?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @esanchezros , thanks for the report and sorry for the delay.
Unfortunately there is no way to trigger the failover programatically. This would probably a sensible enhancement since the current failover mechanism is not customizable. However, there were some plans to make it more customizable (e.g. by implementing a custom strategy) but up to now there was no time to do so.
Describe the bug
We have an initiator configured with 2 acceptors and it connects to them via an sTunnel service running locally:
If the first acceptor is offline, the initiator keeps on trying the first acceptor and never moves on to the failover ones.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
I would expect the initiator to switch over to the failover acceptors when a socket connection failure happens. This is true when the IP address/hostname is not resolvable (the failover mechanism works as expected).
system information:
Additional context
Is there a way to trigger the failover to the next acceptor programmatically?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: