Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
/cc @andrejpetras (liquibase), @geoand (liquibase), @gsmet (liquibase) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
We’re not upgrading to Liquibase 5 at this time due to the upstream license change to the Functional |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
We are using the LTS versions of Quarkus and since 3.27 was released recently we have upgraded our development environments.
After upgrading from the previous LTS version to the new 3.27 version we found that liquibase complains about wrong checksums in our changesets. After some digging it is clear that this is a problem in liquibase 4.33 specifically (see also here and here).
My question is fist if this is already known and second, if there are plans to upgrade to liquibase 5.0.1 (where the bug is fixed) for Quarkus LTS 3.27?
We am aware that LTS 3.20 is still good for some time but these things can take time.
Many thanks in advance,
Tobi
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions