Replies: 7 comments
-
|
My collegue just noticed the same problem few minutes ago |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
up |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
up |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @luca-bassoricci, @Tomnivore, TBH we never really tested QuarkusComponentTest and |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The #51246 should fix the problem. I will also send a PR to update the tests-with-coverage-quickstart. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks @mkouba ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you very much @mkouba ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have to start with the statement that the latest iteration of @QuarkusComponentTest is great! Really nice to get rid of the default constructor requirement.
However now it seems that it doesn't work with the Jacoco setup found in Quarkus Test With Coverage guide. Running tests with the annotation result in 0% coverage. I've tested it with Quarkus 3.29.0 and 3.29.2.
Has anyone noticed this, and fixed it? Or should I perhaps create a bug report?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions