Skip to content

Did you get a chance to look at some similar papers? #10

@niravlekinwala

Description

@niravlekinwala

During my PhD, I have tried to solve the same issue of using NMF based methods for source apportionment. Please check the papers out:

  1. Main article titled "Generalised non-negative matrix factorisation for air pollution source apportionment" available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156294
  2. Software article titled "pyGNMF: A Python library for implementation of generalised non-negative matrix factorisation method" available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101257

GNMF method does not make any assumption about the structure of the uncertainty matrix and can also be a dense matrix.

Feel free to look at the mentioned papers. I have spent quite some time optimising the code so that it runs as fast as possible. However, I was not able complete the error estimation part in the pyGNMF method and thus was published without it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions