-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pathlib: "Incorrect function" during resolve() #76023
Comments
When strict is "false", pathlib should not fail if the network share is inaccessible. It should, as documented, catch the exception and continue with as much of the path as it has. >>> pathlib.Path("v:").resolve()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "C:\Users\erik\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36\lib\pathlib.py", line 1119, in resolve
s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
File "C:\Users\erik\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36\lib\pathlib.py", line 193, in resolve
s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: 'v:' |
Same error occurs when attempting to resolve a path on an ImDisk RAM disk: >>> pathlib.Path("T:\\").resolve()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<input>", line 1, in <module>
File "C:\Users\maciozo\AppData\Local\Continuum\miniconda3\envs\brainboxes\lib\pathlib.py", line 1151, in resolve
s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
File "C:\Users\maciozo\AppData\Local\Continuum\miniconda3\envs\brainboxes\lib\pathlib.py", line 202, in resolve
s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: 'T:\\' |
Same Error. It happend by resolving a path which is not under C: driver, >>> Path().resolve()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 1159, in resolve
s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 202, in resolve
s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: '.'
>>> Path().absolute()
WindowsPath('R:/fileshare/fileshare-s')
>>> Path().absolute().resolve()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 1159, in resolve
s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
File "C:\Users\zom\scoop\apps\miniconda3\current\envs\web\lib\pathlib.py", line 202, in resolve
s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
OSError: [WinError 1] Incorrect function: 'R:\\fileshare\\fileshare-s' |
A redirected filesystem (i.e. a share, whether local or remote) that's physically inaccessible should fail with a FileNotFoundError -- due to underlying errors such as ERROR_BAD_NETPATH (53) or ERROR_BAD_NET_NAME (67). This case is already handled by resolve() in non-strict mode. But error handling for other cases does need to be expanded. A PermissionError should be ignored, from OS errors such as ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED (5), ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION (32), and ERROR_NOT_READY (21). It should ignore errors due to bad reparse points (e.g. filesystem symlinks and mount points), such as ERROR_INVALID_REPARSE_DATA (4392) and ERROR_REPARSE_TAG_INVALID (4393). The resolve() method is supposed to raise a RuntimeError for a symlink loop (i.e. reparse loop). In Windows, the system detects this case as ERROR_CANT_RESOLVE_FILENAME (1921). It's not necessarily due to a reparse loop, but in practice it usually is. (It's actually due to the upper limit for the number of reparse attempts, which as of Windows 10 is no more than 63 attempts.) Maybe this error should be re-raised as a RuntimeError for the sake of compatibility with the POSIX implementation. The above-mentioned cases are all due to WINAPI CreateFileW failing. At a lower level, the reliability of nt._getfinalpathname could be improved for non-strict operation. It could fall back on other forms of the final name that may be supported. It could try FILE_NAME_OPENED instead of FILE_NAME_NORMALIZED to handle a filesystem that does not support normalizing 8.3 short names as long names. Try VOLUME_NAME_GUID instead of VOLUME_NAME_DOS to handle a volume that only has a GUID name (i.e. a volume device that's registered with the mount-point manager but lacks a DOS drive name or even a mountpoint on a volume that has a DOS drive name). Try VOLUME_NAME_NT to handle legacy volume/filesystem devices ('legacy' because they do not support the mount-point manager interface that was introduced almost 20 years ago in NT 5). For the sake of simplicity and performance, the latter case could be limited to well-known DOS device names such as r"\\?\PIPE" -> r"\Device\NamedPipe". The NT device path for the comparison should be queried instead of hard coded, e.g. via QueryDosDeviceW(L"PIPE", ...). |
Hi, is there a status update on this issue? Thanks! |
Still happening on Python 3.9.2 on Win10 when using a Ram Drive. Any chance of getting this fixed? |
bug is worse than that: perfectly valid redirected paths (winfsp ram drives for example) now break in python 3.9.6 (maybe fixed in later version?) >>> import pathlib
>>> p=pathlib.Path('C:\\Users\\erik\\Atakama')
>>> p.resolve()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "c:\users\erik\.pyenv\pyenv-win\versions\3.9.6\Lib\pathlib.py", line 1205, in resolve
s = self._flavour.resolve(self, strict=strict)
File "c:\users\erik\.pyenv\pyenv-win\versions\3.9.6\Lib\pathlib.py", line 206, in resolve
s = self._ext_to_normal(_getfinalpathname(s))
OSError: [WinError 1005] The volume does not contain a recognized file system. ... yet.... dir 'C:\\Users\\erik\\Atakama' mounted via winfsp |
I mounted a WinFsp MEMFS filesystem on a directory, which set a mountpoint that targets the root path of a volume device in the native "\Device" object directory. It didn't create a volume GUID name, which means the mountpoint manager isn't supported in this configuration. The error code ERROR_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME (1005) is meaningless in this case. The mountpoint manager queries a volume with IOCTLs such as IOCTL_MOUNTDEV_QUERY_DEVICE_NAME, which the WinFsp virtual volume (in the above configuration) doesn't support. Weirdly, it returns the error code STATUS_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME instead of STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST. It does this as a lazy workaround for various IOCTLs it receives from filesystem drivers while the volume is in the process of being mounted [1][2]. The side effect is that it returns STATUS_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME for unhandled IOCTLs even when it's not getting mounted. This behavior should have been restricted to when the volume parameter block (VPB) is unmounted. Otherwise it should return the expected error code STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST (i.e. ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION) instead of confusing users with a meaningless error. WinFsp does support the mountpoint manager, in a restricted fashion. The mount target has to be a drive device name in the form "\.\X:". This gets registered with the mountpoint manager as the canonical DOS name of the volume. Since it's a global name, administrator access is required. It also creates a GUID volume name. Run mountvol.exe without arguments to find the volume name that's associated with the drive letter. Then run it again as A new issue should be created to ignore ERROR_UNRECOGNIZED_VOLUME in 3.10+, for which Path.resolve() was updated to call os.path.realpath(). For 3.9, fixing Path.resolve() is still possible. There are 3 remaining bug releases planned: 3.9.9: (2022-01-03), 3.9.10 (2022-02-28), and 3.9.11 (2022-05-02). --- |
Could you re-test this in 3.10 or above? We changed |
We are using symbolic names (example: <XYZ>/my.fil), so these files never exist in literal form. I would still expect from the documentation (3.10):
that only two types of exceptions are possible: FileNotFoundError and RuntimeError, for strict==False only the second one. But we still get an OSError in this case: OSError: [WinError 123] The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect: '<XYZ>\my.fil' OSError is a base class of FileNotFoundError, but not raised as the latter, but as a real OSError. It shouldn't do it in either case, because as mentioned for strict==False only RuntimeError should be allowed. And only for specific circumstances, otherwise the documentation suggests a noop/partial string resolve regarding the input. |
I don't think any Python documentation exhaustively lists exceptions. There are some that are always possible dependent on the arguments passed ( We'd welcome a pull request to add that particular error code into the "assume the path is correct and don't check" codepath pointed out in an earlier response. |
I'm removing the Lines 1437 to 1443 in 1619f43
|
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
Linked PRs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: